BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Terminating Decimal

Expert replies
by rish » Sun Aug 23, 2009 6:02 pm
Any decimal that has only a finite number of nonzero digits is a terminating decimal. For example, 36, 0.72, and 3.005 are terminating decimals.
If a, b, c, d and e are integers and p = 2^a3^b and q = 2^c3^d5^e, is p/q a terminating decimal?



(1) a > c
(2) b > d
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by shanrizvi » Mon Aug 24, 2009 6:55 am
The best way to do this is by picking numbers.

Is p/q = (2^a.3^b)/(2^c.3^d.5^e) a terminal decimal?

e=1

Statement 1: a>c

a=4, c=3

b=2, d=2

p/q = 2/5 (terminating decimal)

Lets pick different values for b and d. b=3, d=4

p/q = 2/15 (not a terminating decimal)

Hence, statement 1 is insufficient.

Statement 2: b>d

b=4, d=3

a=2, b=2

p/q = 3/5 (terminating decimal)

lets take a=2, b=3

p/q = 3/10 (terminating decimal)

Statement 2 is sufficient. Answer: B!
Join the discussion

by rish » Mon Aug 24, 2009 6:59 am
shanrizvi wrote:The best way to do this is by picking numbers.

Is p/q = (2^a.3^b)/(2^c.3^d.5^e) a terminal decimal?

e=1

Statement 1: a>c

a=4, c=3

b=2, d=2

p/q = 2/5 (terminating decimal)

Lets pick different values for b and d. b=3, d=4

p/q = 2/15 (not a terminating decimal)

Hence, statement 1 is insufficient.

Statement 2: b>d

b=4, d=3

a=2, b=2

p/q = 3/5 (terminating decimal)

lets take a=2, b=3

p/q = 3/10 (terminating decimal)

Statement 2 is sufficient. Answer: B!
can you prove this by picking negative numbers ?
eg b=-2, d=-3
Join the discussion

by srivas » Mon Aug 24, 2009 7:47 am
why e should be one [e =1]
Gmat710,, Hyd
Join the discussion

by srivas » Mon Aug 24, 2009 7:47 am
why e should be one [e =1]
Gmat710,, Hyd
Join the discussion

by srivas » Mon Aug 24, 2009 7:48 am
why e should be one [e =1]
Gmat710,, Hyd
Join the discussion

by sreak1089 » Mon Aug 24, 2009 8:32 am
Ans is B IMO.


stmt # 1: a > c Irrespective of whether a > c or a < c, any power of 2 would result in a terminating decimal. Same goes with powers of 5. Since we have powers of 3 in the expression, which can yield a non-terminating decimial, hence stmt #1 is NOT SUFFICIENT.

stmt # 2: b > d => Whether the expression is terminating or not depends on what (b-d) evaulates to. Three possible cases exist for (b-d)

b +ve d +ve => (b-d) +ve (since b > d)
Hence expression is terminating.

b +ve d -ve => (b-d) +ve (since b-d = b+|d|)
Hence expression is terminating.

b -ve d -ve => (b-d) +ve (since b-d = |d|-|b| &&
|d| > |b|)
Hence expression is terminating.

Hence stmt # 2 is SUFFICIENT.

Answer is B
Join the discussion

by rish » Mon Aug 24, 2009 8:50 am
sreak1089 wrote:Ans is B IMO.


stmt # 1: a > c Irrespective of whether a > c or a < c, any power of 2 would result in a terminating decimal. Same goes with powers of 5. Since we have powers of 3 in the expression, which can yield a non-terminating decimial, hence stmt #1 is NOT SUFFICIENT.

stmt # 2: b > d => Whether the expression is terminating or not depends on what (b-d) evaulates to. Three possible cases exist for (b-d)

b +ve d +ve => (b-d) +ve (since b > d)
Hence expression is terminating.

b +ve d -ve => (b-d) +ve (since b-d = b+|d|)
Hence expression is terminating.

b -ve d -ve => (b-d) +ve (since b-d = |d|-|b| &&
|d| > |b|)
Hence expression is terminating.

Hence stmt # 2 is SUFFICIENT.

Answer is B
Thnx for explaining the case when b,d are negative. It helps.

B is the OA.
Join the discussion

by chipbmk » Wed Dec 09, 2009 11:14 am
Thnx for explaining the case when b,d are negative. It helps.

B is the OA.[/quote]

I just got this problem on a practice test and just FYI, the question stem says "a,b,c,d,e are non-negative integers"

Therefore, there is no need to explain the negative for B,D.
Join the discussion