BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Interesting GMATFix Problem-45

Expert replies
by arora007 » Mon Oct 04, 2010 4:21 am
If x notequalto y and y notequalto -1,is [ x/(x-y) ] < [(y-x) /(2+2y) ] ?
1) x>0>y
2) y<-1
https://www.skiponemeal.org/
https://twitter.com/skiponemeal
Few things are impossible to diligence & skill.Great works are performed not by strength,but by perseverance

pm me if you find junk/spam/abusive language, Lets keep our community clean!!
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by Rahul@gurome » Mon Oct 04, 2010 4:53 am
Question is: 2x(1 + y) < -(x - y)^2 or 2x + x^2 + y^2 < 0?

(1) x > 0, y < 0
x^2 and Y^2 will always be positive as they are perfect squares and since x > 0 so 2x > 0
So, 2x + x^2 + y^2 > 0, which means answer to the main question i s"no".
So, (1) is SUFFICIENT.

(2) y < -1, so y will always be negative. x^2 and y^2 will always be positive whether x is positive or negative.
If x is positive, then 2x + x^2 + y^2 > 0
If x is negative, then also 2x + x^2 + y^2 > 0
If x = 0, then also 2x + x^2 + y^2 > 0

So, 2x + x^2 + y^2 > 0, which means answer to the main question i s"no".
So, (2) is SUFFICIENT.

[spoiler]The correct answer is (D).[/spoiler]
Rahul Lakhani
Quant Expert
Gurome, Inc.
https://www.GuroMe.com
On MBA sabbatical (at ISB) for 2011-12 - will stay active as time permits
1-800-566-4043 (USA)
+91-99201 32411 (India)
Join the discussion

by kapil403 » Mon Oct 04, 2010 8:01 am
Rahul I don't think we can generalize given statement to:
Question is: 2x(1 + y) < -(x - y)^2

if -1<y<0 E.g. -0.5, then (1+y) = +ve and sign will remain same
if y< -1 E.g. -2 , then sign will change
Join the discussion

by arora007 » Tue Oct 05, 2010 6:38 am
OA is C.


Image
https://www.skiponemeal.org/
https://twitter.com/skiponemeal
Few things are impossible to diligence & skill.Great works are performed not by strength,but by perseverance

pm me if you find junk/spam/abusive language, Lets keep our community clean!!
Join the discussion

by anantbhatia » Tue Oct 05, 2010 8:20 am
@Rahul: You have incorrectly multiplied the denominator on RHS to LHS. Without knowing the sign of the denominator, we cannot do so.

Simplifying,

we need to find,

(x^2+y^2+2x)/[(x-y)(1+y)] <0

From (1) we know that the numerator will be positive. Also (x-y) in denominator will be positive
But we cannot determine sign of (1+y)

From (2) we cannot even be sure of (x-y)'s sign.

Combining, all other things being positive, we get, 1+y < 0
A definite answer Yes to what we wanted to find. Hence (C)
Join the discussion

by Rahul@gurome » Tue Oct 05, 2010 5:28 pm
anantbhatia wrote:@Rahul: You have incorrectly multiplied the denominator on RHS to LHS. Without knowing the sign of the denominator, we cannot do so.

Simplifying,

we need to find,

(x^2+y^2+2x)/[(x-y)(1+y)] <0

From (1) we know that the numerator will be positive. Also (x-y) in denominator will be positive
But we cannot determine sign of (1+y)

From (2) we cannot even be sure of (x-y)'s sign.

Combining, all other things being positive, we get, 1+y < 0
A definite answer Yes to what we wanted to find. Hence (C)
U r right, OA is (C).
Rahul Lakhani
Quant Expert
Gurome, Inc.
https://www.GuroMe.com
On MBA sabbatical (at ISB) for 2011-12 - will stay active as time permits
1-800-566-4043 (USA)
+91-99201 32411 (India)
Join the discussion