BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Interesting CR

Expert replies
by aspirant2011 » Fri Apr 29, 2011 11:53 pm
Jennifer: Video rental outlets in Centerville together handled 10,000 fewer video rentals in 1994 than in 1993. The decline in rentals was probably due almost entirely to the February 1994 opening of Videorama, the first and only video rental outlet in the area that, in addition to renting videos, also sold them cheaply.

Brad: There must be another explanation: as you yourself said, the decline was on the order of 10,000 rentals. Yet Videorama sold only 4,000 videos in 1994.

Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the force of the objection that Brad
presents to Jennifer's explanation?

A. In 1994 Videorama rented out more videos than it sold.
B. In 1994 two new outlets that rent but that do not sell videos opened in Centerville.
C. Most of the video rental outlets in Centerville rent videos at a discount on certain nights of the week.
D. People often buy videos of movies that they have previously seen in a theater.
E. People who own videos frequently loan them to their friends.

[spoiler]OA: will be posted later. Please discuss each answer choice in detail[/spoiler]
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by vineeshp » Sat Apr 30, 2011 4:39 am
My answer E.

We are looking for an explanation why instead of a 4000 decrease we saw 10000 decrease. IF we are weakening BRad's objection, then Jennifer's point has to be strengthened. This means Videorama was responsible for the decline.

A prephased answer for this is that probably if Videorama dint exist, same movie could have been loaned multiple times. If those movies are sold and then loaned out to friends, that would explain the lack of movie rentals. THis is presented directly by choice E.

A. In 1994 Videorama rented out more videos than it sold. - We already know that the total reduced by 10000.
B. In 1994 two new outlets that rent but that do not sell videos opened in Centerville. - If more opened, yet rentals went down, it doesnt help us.
C. Most of the video rental outlets in Centerville rent videos at a discount on certain nights of the week. - The discount not relevant. We are lookin at the count. Also, a discount will increase, not decrease the rentals.
D. People often buy videos of movies that they have previously seen in a theater. - It weakens Jennifer's point, if anything. Chances are people wouldnt rent out movies they have seen anyway. Does not explain the reduction.
Vineesh,
Just telling you what I know and think. I am not the expert. :)
Join the discussion

by aspirant2011 » Sat Apr 30, 2011 8:09 am
yup OA is E thanks a lot vineeshp :-)
Join the discussion