BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Interest Rate Annual Compound

Expert replies
by Cedagmat » Sun Nov 14, 2010 11:30 am
205. Mike invested a total of $ 5,000 at 5 % simple annual interest rate for n years. Is n > 4?
S1. At the end of n years, Mike's investment plus interest was more than $ 5, 500.
S2. At the end of n years, Mike's investment plus interest was less than $ 6,500.
[spoiler]Answer: E[/spoiler]

Set up the equation A=P(1+r/n)^(nt)
S1: 5,500=5000(1+0.05)^n
1.1=1.05^n : Solve for N

S1: 6,500=5000(1+0.05)^n
1.3=1.05^n : Solve for N

I thought that in both cases since we could solve for N that the answer would be D. Another follow up question is that I do not know how to solve for n in this case. Anyone can help?
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by Ian Stewart » Sun Nov 14, 2010 1:21 pm
Cedagmat wrote:205. Mike invested a total of $ 5,000 at 5 % simple annual interest rate for n years. Is n > 4?
S1. At the end of n years, Mike's investment plus interest was more than $ 5, 500.
S2. At the end of n years, Mike's investment plus interest was less than $ 6,500.
[spoiler]Answer: E[/spoiler]

Set up the equation A=P(1+r/n)^(nt)
S1: 5,500=5000(1+0.05)^n
1.1=1.05^n : Solve for N

S1: 6,500=5000(1+0.05)^n
1.3=1.05^n : Solve for N

I thought that in both cases since we could solve for N that the answer would be D. Another follow up question is that I do not know how to solve for n in this case. Anyone can help?
First, this problem is about "simple interest", and not "compound interest". You're using the compound interest formula.

When interest is 'simple', then the interest is only applied to the initial investment, and not to any accumulated interest. So in this question, each year Mike earns 5% on his $5000 investment, and therefore earns $250 each year. So after n years, he will have 5000 + 250n dollars.

Second, the statements do not give you equations; they give you inequalities. Statement 1 tells you he has *more than* $5500 after n years. Since his investment will be worth 5000 + 250n after n years, from this statement we learn that 5000 + 250n > 5500. From that you can determine that n > 2. Similarly, the second statement tells you that 5000 + 250n < 6500, or that n < 6. So combined we know that 2 < n < 6, but we don't know whether n > 4, so the answer is E.

You could also just list the values of his investment each year:

year 0: $5000
year 1: $5250
year 2: $5500
year 3: $5750
year 4: $6000
year 5: $6250
year 6: $6500

from which you can see that the two statements are not sufficient; n could be 3, 4 or 5.

And to answer your followup question, you won't be asked to solve for n in an equation like 1.3=1.05^n, because you can't do that without a calculator.
For online GMAT math tutoring, or to buy my higher-level Quant books and problem sets, contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com

ianstewartgmat.com
Join the discussion