DS Practice test question #11

This topic has expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 227
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2008 10:43 am
Thanked: 7 times
Followed by:1 members
GMAT Score:650

by California4jx » Fri Aug 29, 2008 8:35 am
IMO: E

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3380
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:20 am
Thanked: 2256 times
Followed by:1535 members
GMAT Score:800

by lunarpower » Fri Aug 29, 2008 10:10 pm
<annoying administrative comment>

just fyi, you could easily type this problem into the forum directly, in something like 10-20% of the time it would take to take a screen shot and upload it to the forum.

and that would be easier for everyone.

--

</annoying administrative comment>

step 1
REPHRASE THE QUESTION


xy > 0 means that x and y have the same sign.

so, the question can be rephrased as
do x and y have the same sign?

--

step 2
INDIVIDUAL STATEMENTS


these are 2 linear inequalities; ALL linear inequalities include at least two neighboring quadrants of the xy-plane.
if you have two neighboring quadrants, then the signs of x and y are going to be the same in one of those quadrants, and opposite in the other one. (this is actually a very useful general takeaway; remember it)

therefore, each of the individual statements is insufficient.

--

step 3
TWO STATEMENTS TOGETHER


here's the best, and simplest, rule to follow as far as combining inequalities:
you can add two inequalities if the inequality signs face the same way.
don't worry about subtracting inequalities - the rules are confusing and annoying. if you're in a situation where the inequalities where one is "<" and the other one is ">", and/or you want to subtract them in order to cancel something, just multiply by -1 and add them.

in these two inequalities, both contain 'x', and the inequality signs are opposite. either one of these things alone is a good enough reason to multiply by -1 and add, but, together, the case is overwhelmingly persuasive.

multiply inequality (2) by -1, giving
x - y > -2
2y - x > 6

add them:
y > 4
so, y is positive.

plug back into the first one:
x - 4 > -2
x > 2
so, x is also positive.

so, x and y have the same sign.

sufficient.

answer = c
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3380
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:20 am
Thanked: 2256 times
Followed by:1535 members
GMAT Score:800

by lunarpower » Fri Aug 29, 2008 10:14 pm
by the way, you can also just GRAPH these inequalities, if you're comfortable with that sort of thing. if you graph the 2 inequalities together, you'll note that their intersection lies entirely within the first quadrant (it's a narrow wedge between two upward-sloping lines).
if anyone wants to see this, post back and i'll draw it and upload it.

don't forget that the official laminated yellow pad contains graph-paper grid lines, so graphing is much easier than it would be if the pad were unlined.

--

even if you're the graphing type, make sure that you still learn the takeaway above about adding inequalities, because it's MUCH more generally applicable and useful. for example, if they throw inequalities at you with 3 or more variables, then graphing is futile, but you can still add the inequalities in exactly the same way that you can in the post above.
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 288
Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2008 10:54 pm
Location: Bombay, India

by missionmba » Sat Aug 30, 2008 12:43 am
lunarpower wrote:<annoying administrative comment>

just fyi, you could easily type this problem into the forum directly, in something like 10-20% of the time it would take to take a screen shot and upload it to the forum.

and that would be easier for everyone.

--

</annoying administrative comment>

step 1
REPHRASE THE QUESTION


xy > 0 means that x and y have the same sign.

so, the question can be rephrased as
do x and y have the same sign?

--

step 2
INDIVIDUAL STATEMENTS


these are 2 linear inequalities; ALL linear inequalities include at least two neighboring quadrants of the xy-plane.
if you have two neighboring quadrants, then the signs of x and y are going to be the same in one of those quadrants, and opposite in the other one. (this is actually a very useful general takeaway; remember it)

therefore, each of the individual statements is insufficient.

--

step 3
TWO STATEMENTS TOGETHER


here's the best, and simplest, rule to follow as far as combining inequalities:
you can add two inequalities if the inequality signs face the same way.
don't worry about subtracting inequalities - the rules are confusing and annoying. if you're in a situation where the inequalities where one is "<" and the other one is ">", and/or you want to subtract them in order to cancel something, just multiply by -1 and add them.

in these two inequalities, both contain 'x', and the inequality signs are opposite. either one of these things alone is a good enough reason to multiply by -1 and add, but, together, the case is overwhelmingly persuasive.

multiply inequality (2) by -1, giving
x - y > -2
2y - x > 6

add them:
y > 4
so, y is positive.

plug back into the first one:
x - 4 > -2
x > 2
so, x is also positive.

so, x and y have the same sign.

sufficient.

answer = c
@lunarpower

You said it right <annoying administrative comment> </annoying administrative comment>

lol

jokes apart

I had to save the intereseting questions before re-installing GMAT-Prep.
n typing the questions again for posting was not a good option

Hope this weakens your argument :D

and thanks for the reply
Mission Mba

Everyone has a will to win but very few have the will to prepare to win

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 14
Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2008 8:51 pm

how to know which inequality to subsitute into

by xyz21 » Sat Feb 21, 2009 10:50 am
Ron,

If we substitute y = 4 in second inquality (2y - x > 6 ) then we'll get x < 2. So how do we know which inequality we should choose to substitute?

With graphical method there isn't any such confusion.

Thanks a lot.

Legendary Member
Posts: 2467
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 6:14 pm
Thanked: 331 times
Followed by:11 members

by cramya » Sat Feb 21, 2009 12:24 pm
If we substitute y = 4 in second inquality (2y - x > 6 ) then we'll get x < 2. So how do we know which inequality we should choose to substitute?

With graphical method there isn't any such confusion.

Go with what u r most comfortable with. The reason why u ran in to the contradiction is because u took y=4 and it should actually be y>4

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 14
Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2008 8:51 pm

Not clear

by xyz21 » Sun Feb 22, 2009 7:52 am
cramya,

how would you substitute y>4 in 2y - x > 6?

Can you show how the calculations will work out?

Thx