DS Practice test question
- Attachments
-
Mission Mba
Everyone has a will to win but very few have the will to prepare to win
Everyone has a will to win but very few have the will to prepare to win
BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course
Redeem
Featured Course
Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand
Scott Woodbury-Stewart’s private virtual classroom — 400 hours of master-class video lessons for the GMAT Focus Edition.
- 715+ score guarantee — highest in the industry (99th percentile)
- 52 chapters · 1,500+ lessons · 4,000+ practice questions
- 400 hours of video · 1,500+ instructor-led HD smartboard lessons
- 300,000+ students accepted to Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, Booth & Sloan & more
- 24/7 live support + weekly Zoom office hours with GMAT instructors
- TTP AI Assist — 24/7 AI-powered virtual tutor for instant help
- 1,200+ flashcards + AI-powered study assistant & daily calendar
- OnDemand, LiveTeach & GMAT Bootcamp formats available
- Also: GRE, SAT Math & Executive Assessment courses
- MBA Admissions Consulting now available
- 🏆 2025 EdTech Breakthrough Award: Test Prep Solution Provider of the Year
- 200,000+ students served
- 5-day free trial — $0 to start, no auto-billing, cancel anytime
★★★★★
5.0
(559 reviews)
130-pt guarantee
$0 to start
then $127/mo
DS Practice test question #11
Source: Beat The GMAT — Data Sufficiency |
<annoying administrative comment>
just fyi, you could easily type this problem into the forum directly, in something like 10-20% of the time it would take to take a screen shot and upload it to the forum.
and that would be easier for everyone.
--
</annoying administrative comment>
step 1
REPHRASE THE QUESTION
xy > 0 means that x and y have the same sign.
so, the question can be rephrased as
do x and y have the same sign?
--
step 2
INDIVIDUAL STATEMENTS
these are 2 linear inequalities; ALL linear inequalities include at least two neighboring quadrants of the xy-plane.
if you have two neighboring quadrants, then the signs of x and y are going to be the same in one of those quadrants, and opposite in the other one. (this is actually a very useful general takeaway; remember it)
therefore, each of the individual statements is insufficient.
--
step 3
TWO STATEMENTS TOGETHER
here's the best, and simplest, rule to follow as far as combining inequalities:
you can add two inequalities if the inequality signs face the same way.
don't worry about subtracting inequalities - the rules are confusing and annoying. if you're in a situation where the inequalities where one is "<" and the other one is ">", and/or you want to subtract them in order to cancel something, just multiply by -1 and add them.
in these two inequalities, both contain 'x', and the inequality signs are opposite. either one of these things alone is a good enough reason to multiply by -1 and add, but, together, the case is overwhelmingly persuasive.
multiply inequality (2) by -1, giving
x - y > -2
2y - x > 6
add them:
y > 4
so, y is positive.
plug back into the first one:
x - 4 > -2
x > 2
so, x is also positive.
so, x and y have the same sign.
sufficient.
answer = c
just fyi, you could easily type this problem into the forum directly, in something like 10-20% of the time it would take to take a screen shot and upload it to the forum.
and that would be easier for everyone.
--
</annoying administrative comment>
step 1
REPHRASE THE QUESTION
xy > 0 means that x and y have the same sign.
so, the question can be rephrased as
do x and y have the same sign?
--
step 2
INDIVIDUAL STATEMENTS
these are 2 linear inequalities; ALL linear inequalities include at least two neighboring quadrants of the xy-plane.
if you have two neighboring quadrants, then the signs of x and y are going to be the same in one of those quadrants, and opposite in the other one. (this is actually a very useful general takeaway; remember it)
therefore, each of the individual statements is insufficient.
--
step 3
TWO STATEMENTS TOGETHER
here's the best, and simplest, rule to follow as far as combining inequalities:
you can add two inequalities if the inequality signs face the same way.
don't worry about subtracting inequalities - the rules are confusing and annoying. if you're in a situation where the inequalities where one is "<" and the other one is ">", and/or you want to subtract them in order to cancel something, just multiply by -1 and add them.
in these two inequalities, both contain 'x', and the inequality signs are opposite. either one of these things alone is a good enough reason to multiply by -1 and add, but, together, the case is overwhelmingly persuasive.
multiply inequality (2) by -1, giving
x - y > -2
2y - x > 6
add them:
y > 4
so, y is positive.
plug back into the first one:
x - 4 > -2
x > 2
so, x is also positive.
so, x and y have the same sign.
sufficient.
answer = c
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.
--
Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi
--
Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.
Yves Saint-Laurent
--
Learn more about ron
--
Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi
--
Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.
Yves Saint-Laurent
--
Learn more about ron
by the way, you can also just GRAPH these inequalities, if you're comfortable with that sort of thing. if you graph the 2 inequalities together, you'll note that their intersection lies entirely within the first quadrant (it's a narrow wedge between two upward-sloping lines).
if anyone wants to see this, post back and i'll draw it and upload it.
don't forget that the official laminated yellow pad contains graph-paper grid lines, so graphing is much easier than it would be if the pad were unlined.
--
even if you're the graphing type, make sure that you still learn the takeaway above about adding inequalities, because it's MUCH more generally applicable and useful. for example, if they throw inequalities at you with 3 or more variables, then graphing is futile, but you can still add the inequalities in exactly the same way that you can in the post above.
if anyone wants to see this, post back and i'll draw it and upload it.
don't forget that the official laminated yellow pad contains graph-paper grid lines, so graphing is much easier than it would be if the pad were unlined.
--
even if you're the graphing type, make sure that you still learn the takeaway above about adding inequalities, because it's MUCH more generally applicable and useful. for example, if they throw inequalities at you with 3 or more variables, then graphing is futile, but you can still add the inequalities in exactly the same way that you can in the post above.
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.
--
Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi
--
Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.
Yves Saint-Laurent
--
Learn more about ron
--
Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi
--
Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.
Yves Saint-Laurent
--
Learn more about ron
@lunarpowerlunarpower wrote:<annoying administrative comment>
just fyi, you could easily type this problem into the forum directly, in something like 10-20% of the time it would take to take a screen shot and upload it to the forum.
and that would be easier for everyone.
--
</annoying administrative comment>
step 1
REPHRASE THE QUESTION
xy > 0 means that x and y have the same sign.
so, the question can be rephrased as
do x and y have the same sign?
--
step 2
INDIVIDUAL STATEMENTS
these are 2 linear inequalities; ALL linear inequalities include at least two neighboring quadrants of the xy-plane.
if you have two neighboring quadrants, then the signs of x and y are going to be the same in one of those quadrants, and opposite in the other one. (this is actually a very useful general takeaway; remember it)
therefore, each of the individual statements is insufficient.
--
step 3
TWO STATEMENTS TOGETHER
here's the best, and simplest, rule to follow as far as combining inequalities:
you can add two inequalities if the inequality signs face the same way.
don't worry about subtracting inequalities - the rules are confusing and annoying. if you're in a situation where the inequalities where one is "<" and the other one is ">", and/or you want to subtract them in order to cancel something, just multiply by -1 and add them.
in these two inequalities, both contain 'x', and the inequality signs are opposite. either one of these things alone is a good enough reason to multiply by -1 and add, but, together, the case is overwhelmingly persuasive.
multiply inequality (2) by -1, giving
x - y > -2
2y - x > 6
add them:
y > 4
so, y is positive.
plug back into the first one:
x - 4 > -2
x > 2
so, x is also positive.
so, x and y have the same sign.
sufficient.
answer = c
You said it right <annoying administrative comment> </annoying administrative comment>
lol
jokes apart
I had to save the intereseting questions before re-installing GMAT-Prep.
n typing the questions again for posting was not a good option
Hope this weakens your argument
and thanks for the reply
Mission Mba
Everyone has a will to win but very few have the will to prepare to win
Everyone has a will to win but very few have the will to prepare to win
Ron,
If we substitute y = 4 in second inquality (2y - x > 6 ) then we'll get x < 2. So how do we know which inequality we should choose to substitute?
With graphical method there isn't any such confusion.
Thanks a lot.
If we substitute y = 4 in second inquality (2y - x > 6 ) then we'll get x < 2. So how do we know which inequality we should choose to substitute?
With graphical method there isn't any such confusion.
Thanks a lot.
If we substitute y = 4 in second inquality (2y - x > 6 ) then we'll get x < 2. So how do we know which inequality we should choose to substitute?
With graphical method there isn't any such confusion.
Go with what u r most comfortable with. The reason why u ran in to the contradiction is because u took y=4 and it should actually be y>4
