BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

integers

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by reachac » Wed Jul 23, 2008 5:14 am
imo c
Join the discussion

by cubicle_bound_misfit » Wed Jul 23, 2008 6:51 am
IMO it is C.

stmt 1 does not talk about P
stmt 2 both can be negative or positive.

combining n> -1 and np>0 as n is integr it can not be 0 so n starts from 1 so does p.

regards,
Cubicle Bound Misfit
Join the discussion

by ravibits » Wed Jul 23, 2008 9:36 pm
Answer would be C.

Explanation:
Option 1 doesn't give any conclusive explanation regarding the range of P.
Option 2 says np>0 so both of them are either positive or negative. So, alone cannot be sufficient to say p>0

Using both of them, np>0 so n is not equal to 0 and p is not equal to 0. and since n>-1, n can only be positive. since np>0, p should also be positive!
Join the discussion

by auntsom » Wed Jul 23, 2008 10:26 pm
IMO E.

1) n+1>0
2) np>0

From 1) it means that n > -1 , so n can still be negative number such as -0.5 or it can also be a positive number such as 2.

If n = -0.5, then p must be negative in order to make np>0
If n = 2, then p must be positive in order to make np>0

Therefore, it's inconclusive that p is positiveor nagative.
Join the discussion

by msd_2008 » Thu Jul 24, 2008 12:12 am
How can we consider value of n as -0.5, when it is clearly mentioned that n & p are integers?
The value can be either 1 or 2 or any other number more than -1. What do you think?

MSD
When the going gets tough, the tough gets going.
Join the discussion

by auntsom » Thu Jul 24, 2008 1:41 am
Oh...yes that's my mistake. It must be an integer. So the answer is C
Join the discussion

by mbaapplicant2008 » Thu Oct 30, 2008 7:34 pm
It should be C because n can be 0.
Join the discussion