BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

insurance company X is considering

Expert replies
by Anni yh » Sun Oct 16, 2016 1:49 am
Insurance Company X is considering issuing a new policy to cover services required by elderly people who suffer from diseases that afflict the elderly. Premiums for the policy must be low enough to attract customers. Therefore, Company X is concerned that the income from the policies would not be sufficient to pay for the claims that would be made.

Which of the following strategies would be most likely to minimize Company X's losses on the policies?

A.Attracting middle-aged customers unlikely to submit claims for benefits for many years
B.Insuring only those individuals who did not suffer any serious diseases as children
C.Including a greater number of services in the policy than are included in other policies of lower cost
D.Insuring only those individuals who were rejected by other companies for similar policies
E.Insuring only those individuals who are wealthy enough to pay for the medical services

the correct answer is A

But I have doubts : although now the company has attracted healthier customers---so in a short future time the company can decrease its loss, in a future, say 30 years later when those middle-aged customers become old, the company will begin to loose a great deal of money as the result of the increase of the claims of those newly aged people. So in a long term, the strategy in A won´t minimize its loss.

Can anyone tells me why my thinking is wrong?

Thank you so much!!
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by MBA Challengers » Sun Oct 16, 2016 11:53 pm
Anni yh wrote:Insurance Company X is considering issuing a new policy to cover services required by elderly people who suffer from diseases that afflict the elderly. Premiums for the policy must be low enough to attract customers. Therefore, Company X is concerned that the income from the policies would not be sufficient to pay for the claims that would be made.

Which of the following strategies would be most likely to minimize Company X's losses on the policies?

A.Attracting middle-aged customers unlikely to submit claims for benefits for many years
B.Insuring only those individuals who did not suffer any serious diseases as children
C.Including a greater number of services in the policy than are included in other policies of lower cost
D.Insuring only those individuals who were rejected by other companies for similar policies
E.Insuring only those individuals who are wealthy enough to pay for the medical services

the correct answer is A

But I have doubts : although now the company has attracted healthier customers---so in a short future time the company can decrease its loss, in a future, say 30 years later when those middle-aged customers become old, the company will begin to loose a great deal of money as the result of the increase of the claims of those newly aged people. So in a long term, the strategy in A won´t minimize its loss.

Can anyone tells me why my thinking is wrong?

Thank you so much!!
Hi Anni Yh,

Let's go over the stimulus before we talk about the options:

Premise 1: New policy to cover elderly people for diseases afflicting the elderly
Premise 2: Since these people will mostly be in the retirement phase, the premium should be low
Conclusion: Will the income from the policies be sufficient to pay for the claims made?

How does the Insurance industry work? The main way in which the insurance industry benefits is the premium that it collects from customers who do not make a claim in a particular year. These premiums are re-invested in the market and also interest is earned for years. So for an insurance industry the most profitable customers are those who pay for years and then claim after 10-15 years. Even then the number of customers who would end up claiming will not be more than 4-5% in a year. By then, they would have anyway made enough from the premiums deposited by the said customer to be able to pay for his claim.

In short, the insurance industry works on probability.

Now, looking at the options, clearly the answer will be A. For the other answers, the reasons are as below:

A. Correct answer as per explanation above
B. Cannot be pre-determined and while the premium can be made higher for such individuals, no guarantee of the number of claim-free premium years. INCORRECT
C. Weakens the possibility of better margins as any service would be a cost. INCORRECT
D. Weakens the possibility of better margins as those individuals would be at an even higher probability to need a claim soon. INCORRECT
E. Even if the individual is wealthy enough to pay for the service, the insurance company would be obligated to pay for it when the individual makes his/her claim INCORRECT

Thus, the answer is A.
Log on to www.mbachallengers.com for
Easy strategic GMAT prep
For any queries mail us at [email protected]
Follow MBA Challengers on Facebook
Join the discussion

by Anni yh » Mon Oct 17, 2016 12:28 am
MBA Challengers wrote:
Anni yh wrote:Insurance Company X is considering issuing a new policy to cover services required by elderly people who suffer from diseases that afflict the elderly. Premiums for the policy must be low enough to attract customers. Therefore, Company X is concerned that the income from the policies would not be sufficient to pay for the claims that would be made.

Which of the following strategies would be most likely to minimize Company X's losses on the policies?

A.Attracting middle-aged customers unlikely to submit claims for benefits for many years
B.Insuring only those individuals who did not suffer any serious diseases as children
C.Including a greater number of services in the policy than are included in other policies of lower cost
D.Insuring only those individuals who were rejected by other companies for similar policies
E.Insuring only those individuals who are wealthy enough to pay for the medical services

the correct answer is A

But I have doubts : although now the company has attracted healthier customers---so in a short future time the company can decrease its loss, in a future, say 30 years later when those middle-aged customers become old, the company will begin to loose a great deal of money as the result of the increase of the claims of those newly aged people. So in a long term, the strategy in A won´t minimize its loss.

Can anyone tells me why my thinking is wrong?

Thank you so much!!
Hi Anni Yh,

Let's go over the stimulus before we talk about the options:

Premise 1: New policy to cover elderly people for diseases afflicting the elderly
Premise 2: Since these people will mostly be in the retirement phase, the premium should be low
Conclusion: Will the income from the policies be sufficient to pay for the claims made?

How does the Insurance industry work? The main way in which the insurance industry benefits is the premium that it collects from customers who do not make a claim in a particular year. These premiums are re-invested in the market and also interest is earned for years. So for an insurance industry the most profitable customers are those who pay for years and then claim after 10-15 years. Even then the number of customers who would end up claiming will not be more than 4-5% in a year. By then, they would have anyway made enough from the premiums deposited by the said customer to be able to pay for his claim.

In short, the insurance industry works on probability.

Now, looking at the options, clearly the answer will be A. For the other answers, the reasons are as below:

A. Correct answer as per explanation above
B. Cannot be pre-determined and while the premium can be made higher for such individuals, no guarantee of the number of claim-free premium years. INCORRECT
C. Weakens the possibility of better margins as any service would be a cost. INCORRECT
D. Weakens the possibility of better margins as those individuals would be at an even higher probability to need a claim soon. INCORRECT
E. Even if the individual is wealthy enough to pay for the service, the insurance company would be obligated to pay for it when the individual makes his/her claim INCORRECT

Thus, the answer is A.
Thank You so much!! Your explanation is very clear and I finally understand now! thank you!!
Join the discussion