BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Inequality + function + coordinate

Expert replies
by MAAJ » Wed Jan 19, 2011 10:31 am
In the xy-plane, region R consist of all the points (x, y) such that 2x + 3y ≤ 6. Is the point (r, s) in region R?

(1) 3r + 2s ≤ 6

(2) r ≤ 3 and s ≤ 2

Not satisfied with the answer from the OG, particularly on the second statement... it's easier to solve by picking numbers but can some1 try to solve it by graphing? I'm curious about the graphic of statement 2...

Correct Answer [spoiler](E)[/spoiler]
"There's a difference between interest and commitment. When you're interested in doing something, you do it only when circumstance permit. When you're committed to something, you accept no excuses, only results."
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by anshumishra » Wed Jan 19, 2011 11:25 am
MAAJ wrote:In the xy-plane, region R consist of all the points (x, y) such that 2x + 3y ≤ 6. Is the point (r, s) in region R?

(1) 3r + 2s ≤ 6

(2) r ≤ 3 and s ≤ 2

Not satisfied with the answer from the OG, particularly on the second statement... it's easier to solve by picking numbers but can some1 try to solve it by graphing? I'm curious about the graphic of statement 2...

Correct Answer [spoiler](E)[/spoiler]

question : is 2r+3s <=6 ?

Statement 1:
3r+2s = 6
if r=2,s=0 => 2r+3s = 4 < 6
if r=0,s=3 => 2r+3s = 7 > 6 So, not sufficient

Statement 2:
r<=3 and s<=2
if r=2,s=0 => 2r+3s = 4 < 6
if r=2,s=1 => 2r+3s = 7 > 6 So, not sufficient

Combined 1 and 2 :
if r=2,s=0 => 2r+3s = 4 < 6
if s=2,r=2/3 => 2r+3s = 4/3+6 > 6 Still not sufficient.

Hence, E
Thanks
Anshu

(Every mistake is a lesson learned )
Join the discussion

by Rahul@gurome » Wed Jan 19, 2011 12:14 pm
MAAJ wrote:... it's easier to solve by picking numbers but can some1 try to solve it by graphing? I'm curious about the graphic of statement 2...
Here is the graphic approach.
If you are familiar with graphic approach you can solve these kind problem very fast. If you don't feel comfortable with it, don't go for it. Picking number is much easier for you.

Image

Refer to the figure above.

The blue line is the line with equation 2x + 3y = 6.
Hence the region below the blue line, i.e. the side on which origin lies is the region satisfying 2x + 3y ≤ 6. Hence we need to see whether the points satisfying the statements are part of it or not.

Statement 1: 3r + 2s ≤ 6
The red line is the line with equation 3x + 2y = 6.
Hence the region below the blue line, i.e. the side on which origin lies is the region satisfying 3x + 2y ≤ 6. As 3x + 2y ≤ 6, (r, s) must lies within the region 3x + 2y ≤ 6.

From the figure we can see that some part of the coordinate plane is common with the region given in question stem and some part are not.

Not sufficient

Statement 1: r ≤ 3 and s ≤ 2
The green and the brown lines are the equation for x = 3 and y = 2 respectively. Hence the point (r, s) must lie below the brown line and left to the green line.

Again we see that some part of the coordinate plane is common with the region given in question stem and some part are not.

Not sufficient

1 & 2 Together: Now the point (r, s) must lie below the brown line and left to the green line and also below the red line. Now we have a small triangle which satisfies the above condition but lies above the blue line. And other part is common.

Not sufficient

The correct answer is E.
Rahul Lakhani
Quant Expert
Gurome, Inc.
https://www.GuroMe.com
On MBA sabbatical (at ISB) for 2011-12 - will stay active as time permits
1-800-566-4043 (USA)
+91-99201 32411 (India)
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Wed Jan 19, 2011 1:05 pm
MAAJ wrote:In the xy-plane, region R consist of all the points (x, y) such that 2x + 3y ≤ 6. Is the point (r, s) in region R?

(1) 3r + 2s ≤ 6

(2) r ≤ 3 and s ≤ 2

Not satisfied with the answer from the OG, particularly on the second statement... it's easier to solve by picking numbers but can some1 try to solve it by graphing? I'm curious about the graphic of statement 2...

Correct Answer [spoiler](E)[/spoiler]
While this looks like a geometry problem, it can be treated as an algebra problem. If (r,s) is in region R, then it must satisfy the conditions of the inequality. Thus, the question can be rewritten as:

Is 2r + 3s ≤ 6?

Statement 1: 3r + 2s ≤ 6
r=0 and s=3 works, because 3(0) + 2(3) ≤ 6. Is 2(0) + 3(3) ≤ 6? No.
r=2 and s=0 works, because 3(2) + 2(0) ≤ 6. Is 2(2) + 3(0) ≤ 6? Yes.
Since the answer can be both no and yes, insufficient.

Statement 2: r ≤ 3 and s ≤ 2
r=2 and s=0 works, because 2 ≤ 3 and 0 ≤ 2. Is 2(2) + 3(0) ≤ 6? Yes.
r=3 and s=2 works, because 3 ≤ 3 and 2 ≤ 2. Is 2(3) + 3(2) ≤ 6? No.
Since the answer can be both yes and no, insufficient.

Statements 1 and 2 together:
We saw above that r=2 and s=0 satisfy both statements. Is 2(2) + 3(0) ≤ 6? Yes.
To change the answer from yes to no, we need to maximize r and s. The largest combination that satisfies both statements is
r=2/3 and s=2. Is 2(2/3) + 3(2) ≤ 6? No.
Since the answer can be both yes and no, insufficient.

The correct answer is E.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by MAAJ » Mon Jan 24, 2011 8:26 am
So that little triangle above the blue line is the part that tell us that its insufficient. Guess I didn't have that much care when I was graphing :P

Thanks all!
"There's a difference between interest and commitment. When you're interested in doing something, you do it only when circumstance permit. When you're committed to something, you accept no excuses, only results."
Join the discussion

by OneTwoThreeFour » Tue Apr 12, 2011 3:37 pm
The best way to approach this problem is from a conceptual approach. Even by drawing graphs, I was having trouble doing this problem in under 2 minutes. (Plus it gets messy when you have multiple lines and try to determine the area that doesn't overlap and calculate the x intercepts too.) The first step is to realize that 2x+3y<=6 also equals to y <= 2 -2/3x. This means that the condition in the question is only satisfied when (r,s) is either a distinct point or has a slope of -2/3x and a y-intercept that is less than or equal to 2. Knowing this in mind, it is very easy to realize the first condition is insufficient and the second one is not either, since it gives a range of values, instead of a distinct point. Putting them together is also insufficient since the slope is not -2/3x.
Join the discussion