BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATBootcamp Starts Sep 28
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE BOOTCAMP

Live Online Bootcamp Class with Top GMAT Expert Chris Peckover

15 live classes from Sep 28, 2026

Schedule
Mon to Fri · 7:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
Live classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class
  • 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included
View bootcamp & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Inequalities

Expert replies
by krishna kumar » Tue Jun 15, 2010 4:42 am
Hi,

I have this problem from the Sets -(set 28 problem 5)

Is |x|< 1?
(1) |x + 1| = 2|x - 1|
(2) |x - 3| ≠ 0

The OA is C.

I haven't been able to figure that one out.

I figured that both 1 and 2 are not sufficient.

Could any one help.

thanks
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by kvcpk » Tue Jun 15, 2010 5:05 am
By solving for different cases using statement1, we get
x=1/3 or x=3

one value of x is less than1 and the other greater than 1

So we need to use the statement2 which says that x is not equal to 3

So x =1/3 which means that IxI<1

Hence C

Hope it Helps!!
Join the discussion

by ssuarezo » Tue Jun 15, 2010 9:00 am
kvcpk wrote:By solving for different cases using statement1, we get
x=1/3 or x=3

one value of x is less than1 and the other greater than 1

So we need to use the statement2 which says that x is not equal to 3

So x =1/3 which means that IxI<1

Hence C
Hi kvcpk:
Could you give more detail of how u got x=1/3, 3 from stm1? I thought I knew abs values but your answer I will simplify my review.
Thanks
Silvia
Join the discussion

by Testluv » Tue Jun 15, 2010 1:19 pm
Hi kvcpk:
Could you give more detail of how u got x=1/3, 3 from stm1? I thought I knew abs values but your answer I will simplify my review.
Thanks
Silvia

(1) |x+1| = 2|x-1|

case 1:

x + 1 = 2x - 2
x = 3

case 2:
-(x+1) = 2x - 2
x = 1/3

We always have 2 cases when dealing with absolute value. When we see the absolute value bars on both sides of the equation, we only have to take pos an neg of one side.
Kaplan Teacher in Toronto
Join the discussion

by kvcpk » Tue Jun 15, 2010 8:35 pm
Testluv wrote:
Hi kvcpk:
Could you give more detail of how u got x=1/3, 3 from stm1? I thought I knew abs values but your answer I will simplify my review.
Thanks
Silvia

(1) |x+1| = 2|x-1|

case 1:

x + 1 = 2x - 2
x = 3

case 2:
-(x+1) = 2x - 2
x = 1/3

We always have 2 cases when dealing with absolute value. When we see the absolute value bars on both sides of the equation, we only have to take pos an neg of one side.
Thanks TestLuv.. I was late to respond..
Join the discussion