Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

inequalities

Expert replies
by marie » Thu Oct 01, 2009 11:08 am
as part of a ds problem I had to resolve:

x^2 > 2x i.e., {x squared is greater than 2x}

is the answer: x>2 and x<0 or x>2 and x<-2??

thxs,
please show all steps!
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

Re: inequalities

by JeffB » Thu Oct 01, 2009 2:57 pm
marie wrote:as part of a ds problem I had to resolve:

x^2 > 2x i.e., {x squared is greater than 2x}

is the answer: x>2 and x<0 or x>2 and x<-2??

thxs,
please show all steps!
x^2 > 2x

x^2 - 2x > 0
x(x - 2) > 0

0 > x > 2
Join the discussion

Re: inequalities

by Stuart@KaplanGMAT » Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:37 pm
marie wrote:as part of a ds problem I had to resolve:

x^2 > 2x i.e., {x squared is greater than 2x}

is the answer: x>2 and x<0 or x>2 and x<-2??

thxs,
please show all steps!
As JeffB notes, we can simplify to:

x(x-2)>0

Let's see how we get from there to the final answer.

First, we recognize that to obtain a positive product, either both terms are positive or both are negative. Accordingly, we can set up two pairs of inequalities.

The positive case gives us:

x>0 AND x-2>0
x>0 AND x>2

When we have two inequalities pointing in the same direction, we must satisfy the more limiting inequality. In this case, that means that x>2.

The negative case gives us:

x<0 AND x-2<0
x<0 AND x<2

Again choosing the more limiting inequality, we get x<0.

So, to satisfy the original inequality, either:

x<0 OR x>2.
Image

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto

Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course
Join the discussion

Inequalities

by marie » Fri Oct 02, 2009 4:12 pm
Stuart,
Thank you for that. Help me understand where the following line of reasoning goes wrong.

x^2 > 2x
assume x is negative therefore
(-x)(-x) > 2(-x)
divide both sides by -x
-x < 2
multiply by -1
x > -2

Thxs
Join the discussion

Re: Inequalities

by Stuart@KaplanGMAT » Fri Oct 02, 2009 7:13 pm
marie wrote:Stuart,
Thank you for that. Help me understand where the following line of reasoning goes wrong.

x^2 > 2x
assume x is negative therefore
(-x)(-x) > 2(-x)
divide both sides by -x
-x < 2
multiply by -1
x > -2

Thxs
Assuming x is negative doesn't mean we replace it with "-x" in the equation; if x is negative and you write "-x", you're actually looking at a double negative, which is positive.

If we assume x is negative, we leave it as written, we just remember to flip the inequality when we divide by x. So:

x*x>2x

dividing by x:

x<2

which is trivial - all we've shown is that if x is negative, then it's less than 2, which is true of all negative numbers.

I guess the more fundamental issue is why you're assuming that x is negative - how does that help you solve this problem?
Image

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto

Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course
Join the discussion