BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

inequalities

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

Re: inequalities

by JeffB » Thu Oct 01, 2009 2:57 pm
marie wrote:as part of a ds problem I had to resolve:

x^2 > 2x i.e., {x squared is greater than 2x}

is the answer: x>2 and x<0 or x>2 and x<-2??

thxs,
please show all steps!
x^2 > 2x

x^2 - 2x > 0
x(x - 2) > 0

0 > x > 2
Join the discussion

Re: inequalities

by Stuart@KaplanGMAT » Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:37 pm
marie wrote:as part of a ds problem I had to resolve:

x^2 > 2x i.e., {x squared is greater than 2x}

is the answer: x>2 and x<0 or x>2 and x<-2??

thxs,
please show all steps!
As JeffB notes, we can simplify to:

x(x-2)>0

Let's see how we get from there to the final answer.

First, we recognize that to obtain a positive product, either both terms are positive or both are negative. Accordingly, we can set up two pairs of inequalities.

The positive case gives us:

x>0 AND x-2>0
x>0 AND x>2

When we have two inequalities pointing in the same direction, we must satisfy the more limiting inequality. In this case, that means that x>2.

The negative case gives us:

x<0 AND x-2<0
x<0 AND x<2

Again choosing the more limiting inequality, we get x<0.

So, to satisfy the original inequality, either:

x<0 OR x>2.
Image

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto

Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course
Join the discussion

Inequalities

by marie » Fri Oct 02, 2009 4:12 pm
Stuart,
Thank you for that. Help me understand where the following line of reasoning goes wrong.

x^2 > 2x
assume x is negative therefore
(-x)(-x) > 2(-x)
divide both sides by -x
-x < 2
multiply by -1
x > -2

Thxs
Join the discussion

Re: Inequalities

by Stuart@KaplanGMAT » Fri Oct 02, 2009 7:13 pm
marie wrote:Stuart,
Thank you for that. Help me understand where the following line of reasoning goes wrong.

x^2 > 2x
assume x is negative therefore
(-x)(-x) > 2(-x)
divide both sides by -x
-x < 2
multiply by -1
x > -2

Thxs
Assuming x is negative doesn't mean we replace it with "-x" in the equation; if x is negative and you write "-x", you're actually looking at a double negative, which is positive.

If we assume x is negative, we leave it as written, we just remember to flip the inequality when we divide by x. So:

x*x>2x

dividing by x:

x<2

which is trivial - all we've shown is that if x is negative, then it's less than 2, which is true of all negative numbers.

I guess the more fundamental issue is why you're assuming that x is negative - how does that help you solve this problem?
Image

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto

Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course
Join the discussion