Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Inequalities

Expert replies
by beater » Wed Oct 08, 2008 12:24 pm
Is 2y>3z?

1. 3y > 2z
2. y < 2z

Is there a way to solve this using transitive properties?
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

looking for a solution or a specific method?

by gace780 » Wed Oct 08, 2008 1:42 pm
2y>3z same as 6y>9z

A:
===
3y>2z ===> 6y > 4z

B:
===
y<2z ====> 6y <12z

Both together 4z < 6y <12z

Therefore, 6y may or may not be greater than 9z. Answer is E!
Join the discussion

by gmat009 » Wed Oct 08, 2008 9:09 pm
IMO A
What's OA
Join the discussion

by namitrajiv » Wed Oct 08, 2008 9:17 pm
should be E
We need to find if y>1.5 z
first statement says y>0.66 Z , clearly insufficient because if y >0.66 z it can or cannot be greater than 1.5 z

2nd statement says y<2z, again insufficient because if y <2z it can or cannot be greater than 1.5 z

combined 0.66z<y<2z
again y can be greater than or less than 1.5 z , possible values of y are
1.2 z(<1.5z), 1.7z(>1.5z)
Join the discussion

by gmat009 » Wed Oct 08, 2008 9:21 pm
namitrajiv wrote:should be E
We need to find if y>1.5 z
first statement says y>0.66 Z , clearly insufficient because if y >0.66 z it can or cannot be greater than 1.5 z

2nd statement says y<2z, again insufficient because if y <2z it can or cannot be greater than 1.5 z

combined 0.66z<y<2z
again y can be greater than or less than 1.5 z , possible values of y are
1.2 z(<1.5z), 1.7z(>1.5z)
Yes you are right....
By mistake I understood in a wrong way.
Join the discussion