BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Inequalities + Absolute Value questoin

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by Mike@Magoosh » Tue Jan 10, 2012 6:29 pm
Hi! I'm happy to contribute on this one. :)

First of all, if you are doing guesswork plugging in numbers for x, then always always consider fractions less than one as one possibility. Often those numbers behave differently from other numbers, and can be a conclusion-changer in DS.

As for this particular question, I'll do an algebraic solution in case you are interested.

Question: is x > 0

Statement #1: |x+3|<4

That means that -4 < x + 3 < 4

Subtract 3 from all three conditions, and we have: -7 < x < 1. So, under this condition, x could be negative (down to -7) or positive (between zero and 1). Remember, there's a whole infinity of numbers between zero and 1: please don't forget they're there. By itself, Statement #1 is insufficient.


Statement #2: |x-3|<4

That means that -4 < x - 3 < 4

Add three to all three conditions, and we have -1 < x < 7. So, under this condition, x can be positive (up to 7) or negative (between -1 and 0). Again, another whole infinity of numbers between -1 and zero: don't forget about them! By itself, Statement #2 is insufficient.

Combined Statements #1 & #2

We combine the conditions -7 < x < 1 and -1 < x < 7. To satisfy both of those conditions simultaneously, x must be between -1 and +1: -1 < x < 1. That's the overlap, or intersection, of the two regions. Well, x can still be positive or negative, so even combined, the statements are insufficient. Answer = E.

Does that make sense? Please let me know if you have any questions on what I've said.

Mike :)
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
https://gmat.magoosh.com/
Join the discussion

7

by pemdas » Wed Jan 11, 2012 10:00 am
st(1) cases considered x+3>-4 and x+3<4, accordingly x >-7 and x<1 Insuff

st(2) cases considered x-3>-4 and x-3<4, accordingly x>-1 and x<7 Insuff

Combining st(1&2) still Insuff

answering your question: you must not assume 0<x<1, as you need to satisfy x>0 which extends beyond 1 and embraces all positive values through +ve infinity.
adt29 wrote:Is x > 0?

(1) |x+3|<4 (2) |x-3|<4




E

I was able to get the answer but with a bit of guess work. Should one be assuming that x can be a non-integer between 0 and 1?
Success doesn't come overnight!
Join the discussion