BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Work

This topic has expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
Legendary Member
Posts: 869
Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2009 3:49 pm
Location: California
Thanked: 13 times
Followed by:3 members

Work

by heshamelaziry » Mon Nov 16, 2009 10:13 pm
Machine A and Machine B can produce 1 widget in 3 hours working together at their respective constant rates. If Machine A's speed were doubled, the two machines could produce 1 widget in 2 hours working together at their respective rates. How many hours does it currently take Machine A to produce 1 widget on its own?

1/2

2

3

5

6

OA 6
Last edited by heshamelaziry on Mon Nov 16, 2009 10:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Top
Source: — Problem Solving |
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 328
Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2008 5:25 pm
Location: Philadelphia
Thanked: 4 times
GMAT Score:550

by Abdulla » Mon Nov 16, 2009 10:28 pm
heshamelaziry wrote:Machine A and Machine B can produce 1 widget in 3 hours working together at their respective constant rates. If Machine A's speed were doubled, the two machines could produce 1 widget in 2 hours working together at their respective rates. How many hours does it currently take Machine A to produce 1 widget on its own?

1/2

2

3

5

6
IMO E
Let me try it.. correct me if I'm wrong

a + b = 1/3 ------------(1)
2a+b = 1/2 -----> b= 1/2 - 2a -------------(2)

Substitute 2 into 1

a + 1/2 - 2a = 1/3
-a = 1/3 - 1/2
-a = - 1/6
a = 1/6 , which means a can produce one widget in 6 hours.
Abdulla
Top
Legendary Member
Posts: 869
Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2009 3:49 pm
Location: California
Thanked: 13 times
Followed by:3 members

by heshamelaziry » Mon Nov 16, 2009 10:38 pm
Abdulla wrote:
heshamelaziry wrote:Machine A and Machine B can produce 1 widget in 3 hours working together at their respective constant rates. If Machine A's speed were doubled, the two machines could produce 1 widget in 2 hours working together at their respective rates. How many hours does it currently take Machine A to produce 1 widget on its own?

1/2

2

3

5

6
IMO E
Let me try it.. correct me if I'm wrong

a + b = 1/3 ------------(1)
2a+b = 1/2 -----> b= 1/2 - 2a -------------(2)

Substitute 2 into 1

a + 1/2 - 2a = 1/3
-a = 1/3 - 1/2
-a = - 1/6
a = 1/6 , which means a can produce one widget in 6 hours.
Abdulla,

i know that 1/a + 1/b = 1/3, form here I don't understand. I saw different way fo solving it. Yuor seems simpler.
Top
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 328
Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2008 5:25 pm
Location: Philadelphia
Thanked: 4 times
GMAT Score:550

by Abdulla » Mon Nov 16, 2009 11:18 pm
heshamelaziry wrote:
Abdulla wrote:
heshamelaziry wrote:Machine A and Machine B can produce 1 widget in 3 hours working together at their respective constant rates. If Machine A's speed were doubled, the two machines could produce 1 widget in 2 hours working together at their respective rates. How many hours does it currently take Machine A to produce 1 widget on its own?

1/2

2

3

5

6
IMO E
Let me try it.. correct me if I'm wrong

a + b = 1/3 ------------(1)
2a+b = 1/2 -----> b= 1/2 - 2a -------------(2)

Substitute 2 into 1

a + 1/2 - 2a = 1/3
-a = 1/3 - 1/2
-a = - 1/6
a = 1/6 , which means a can produce one widget in 6 hours.
Abdulla,

i know that 1/a + 1/b = 1/3, form here I don't understand. I saw different way fo solving it. Yuor seems simpler.
Yeah this is a great formula to use but not with those kind of problems where you have variables instead of numbers (rates).
Usually, I use widget/hour when I have for example, A produce 3 widgets in 4 hours and B produce 2 widgets in 3 hours. In this case your formula works best.
Abdulla
Top
Legendary Member
Posts: 869
Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2009 3:49 pm
Location: California
Thanked: 13 times
Followed by:3 members

by heshamelaziry » Mon Nov 16, 2009 11:39 pm
How did you get a + b = 1/3 ? I have usually seen this as either 1/a + 1/b = 1/3 or a + b = 3. I understand you solution, but it is the first time i see work problem solved this way, and like to understand the logic.
Top
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 328
Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2008 5:25 pm
Location: Philadelphia
Thanked: 4 times
GMAT Score:550

by Abdulla » Mon Nov 16, 2009 11:52 pm
heshamelaziry wrote:How did you get a + b = 1/3 ? I have usually seen this as either 1/a + 1/b = 1/3 or a + b = 3. I understand you solution, but it is the first time i see work problem solved this way, and like to understand the logic.
Simply consider the variable as a rate without writing it down as 1/a because at the end you will get a fraction.

if a+b = 1/3, then a and b must be fractions B-)
Abdulla
Top
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 434
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 9:48 pm
Location: Bangalore
Thanked: 6 times
GMAT Score:600

by viju9162 » Tue Nov 17, 2009 4:31 am
For this problem, I understood like this:

A+B can produce 1 widget in 3 hours. Therefore, in 1 hour, A+B can produce 1/3 of widget

similarly, 2A+B can produce 1 widget in 2 hours. Hence, 2A+B can produce 1/2 of widget in an hour.

By simplication A = 1/6 . It completes 1/6 th of job . Therefore, it takes 6 hours to do the job alone.

For other types, if A or B value is given, we can determine hourly work rate and try to find the unknown value .

Regards,
Viju
"Native of" is used for a individual while "Native to" is used for a large group
Top
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1