BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Number line product

Expert replies
by karthikpandian19 » Fri Jan 06, 2012 9:06 pm
On the number line, if the number "k" is left to the number "t", is the product "kt" to the right of "t"?

1. t<0
2. k<1

How to do this DS problem fast???
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by anandhimanshu85 » Fri Jan 06, 2012 9:15 pm
I think its A
karthikpandian19 wrote:On the number line, if the number "k" is left to the number "t", is the product "kt" to the right of "t"?

1. t<0
2. k<1

How to do this DS problem fast???
Join the discussion

by karthikpandian19 » Fri Jan 06, 2012 9:22 pm
OA is A

but can anyone provide the explanation????
Join the discussion

by neelgandham » Fri Jan 06, 2012 9:23 pm
On the number line, if the number "k" is left to the number "t", is the product "kt" to the right of "t"?
1. t<0
t<0, implies k<0 as the number "k" is left to the number "t". The value of kt > 0(-ve * -ve = +ve)
Sufficient to answer 'is the product "kt" to the right of "t"?'
2. k<1

let k = 1/2, and t = 2, kt = 1 and lies between k and t
let k = 0 and t = 2, kt = 0 and lies on k
let k = -1/2 and t = 10, kt = -5, lies to the left of k
Hence, Insufficient

IMO A
Anil Gandham
Welcome to BEATtheGMAT | Photography | Getting Started | BTG Community rules | MBA Watch
Check out GMAT Prep Now's online course at https://www.gmatprepnow.com/
Join the discussion

by mj78ind » Sat Jan 07, 2012 11:18 am
karthikpandian19 wrote:On the number line, if the number "k" is left to the number "t", is the product "kt" to the right of "t"?

1. t<0
2. k<1

How to do this DS problem fast???
Interesting!

We have to find kt > t ----- (1) , when t > k.

Solving (1), t(k-1)>0
Hence there are two cases possible for the above to hold:
1. t > 0 AND k > 1

OR

2. t < 0 AND k < 1

Now looking at the statements:
Stmt 1 - t < 0, k has to be < 1 in fact k < t < 0. This is always case 2 above. Hence Stmt 1 is sufficient.

Stmt 2 - k<1. t can be <0 or >0. For example, k = -2, t = -1 kt = 2 hence kt > t. k = 0.7 t = 0.9 kt = 0.63, hence kt <t. Hence Stmt 2 is insufficient.

Answer A
Call me 1 - (412) 897 6727 (US) or leave a msg on BTG for GMAT advise / questions.
If you like the solution, check out my debrief at and leave a comment:
https://www.beatthegmat.com/760-done-dea ... 66740.html
Join the discussion