BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem
TTP OnDemand GMAT Video Course
Featured Course

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Scott Woodbury-Stewart’s private virtual classroom — 400 hours of master-class video lessons for the GMAT Focus Edition.

  • 715+ score guarantee — highest in the industry (99th percentile)
  • 52 chapters · 1,500+ lessons · 4,000+ practice questions
  • 400 hours of video · 1,500+ instructor-led HD smartboard lessons
  • 300,000+ students accepted to Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, Booth & Sloan & more
  • 24/7 live support + weekly Zoom office hours with GMAT instructors
  • TTP AI Assist — 24/7 AI-powered virtual tutor for instant help
  • 1,200+ flashcards + AI-powered study assistant & daily calendar
  • OnDemand, LiveTeach & GMAT Bootcamp formats available
  • Also: GRE, SAT Math & Executive Assessment courses
  • MBA Admissions Consulting now available
  • 🏆 2025 EdTech Breakthrough Award: Test Prep Solution Provider of the Year
  • 200,000+ students served
  • 5-day free trial — $0 to start, no auto-billing, cancel anytime
★★★★★ 5.0 (559 reviews)
130-pt guarantee
$0 to start then $127/mo
Start Free 5-Day Trial Read 559 Reviews →

Exploitation

Expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 371
Joined: Fri Mar 06, 2009 2:48 am
Thanked: 27 times
GMAT Score:740
by 2010gmat » Mon Apr 27, 2009 5:39 am
Sven: Trade unions are traditionally regarded by governments and economists as restraints of trade, working against the complete freedom of the economy, but I believe that unions are indispensable since they are often the worker’s only protection against exploitation.
Ravi: I don’t agree. The exploitation of the workers and their work is a normal part of ordinary trade just like the exploitation of natural or other material resources.
Sven and Ravi will not be able to resolve their disagreement logically unless they
(A) define a key term
(B) rely on the opinions of established authorities
(C) question an unproved premise
(D) present supporting data
(E) distinguish fact from opinion

---------------------------
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Source: — Critical Reasoning |
Legendary Member
Posts: 940
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 3:22 amFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 55 times

Re: Exploitation

by iamcste » Mon Apr 27, 2009 6:27 am
2010gmat wrote:Sven: Trade unions are traditionally regarded by governments and economists as restraints of trade, working against the complete freedom of the economy, but I believe that unions are indispensable since they are often the worker’s only protection against exploitation.
Ravi: I don’t agree. The exploitation of the workers and their work is a normal part of ordinary trade just like the exploitation of natural or other material resources.
Sven and Ravi will not be able to resolve their disagreement logically unless they
(A) define a key term
(B) rely on the opinions of established authorities
(C) question an unproved premise
(D) present supporting data
(E) distinguish fact from opinion

---------------------------

IMO A

S talks about Trade unions, exploitation protection of workers specifically

E talks about general Trade, exploitation of workers and work

So, Key term of Argument equivocates.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 431
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 9:32 amFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 16 times

Re: Exploitation

by kanha81 » Mon Apr 27, 2009 9:17 am
iamcste wrote:
2010gmat wrote:Sven: Trade unions are traditionally regarded by governments and economists as restraints of trade, working against the complete freedom of the economy, but I believe that unions are indispensable since they are often the worker’s only protection against exploitation.
Ravi: I don’t agree. The exploitation of the workers and their work is a normal part of ordinary trade just like the exploitation of natural or other material resources.
Sven and Ravi will not be able to resolve their disagreement logically unless they
(A) define a key term
(B) rely on the opinions of established authorities
(C) question an unproved premise
(D) present supporting data
(E) distinguish fact from opinion

---------------------------

IMO A

S talks about Trade unions, exploitation protection of workers specifically

E talks about general Trade, exploitation of workers and work

So, Key term of Argument equivocates.
I agree.
Want to Beat GMAT.
Always do what you're afraid to do. Whoooop GMAT
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 371
Joined: Fri Mar 06, 2009 2:48 am
Thanked: 27 times
GMAT Score:740

by 2010gmat » Mon Apr 27, 2009 9:32 am
Great! you both knocked it...

How to approach these kind of problems? I felt that answer is E because both S and T are giving their opinions rather than basing their argument on fact....

And can anyone provide link to more such problems for practice?
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 431
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 9:32 amFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 16 times

by kanha81 » Mon Apr 27, 2009 9:56 am
2010gmat wrote:Great! you both knocked it...

How to approach these kind of problems? I felt that answer is E because both S and T are giving their opinions rather than basing their argument on fact....

And can anyone provide link to more such problems for practice?
The key to identify correct answer is knowing the wrong answers. This is a Point at Issue type of question.

Here, the "trade" terminology was under discussion which was interpreted differently by the two speakers. I had listed [E] as one of the contenders, but the answer [E] only agreed to what Ravi had to say, and not with Sven. As we can see Sven represented facts and Ravi represented opinion, do differentiating between them is not going to help resolve the disagreement. In order to resolve something you need to reach a common ground or identify the cause behind issue as how that issue came into existence. Hope this helps.
Want to Beat GMAT.
Always do what you're afraid to do. Whoooop GMAT
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 371
Joined: Fri Mar 06, 2009 2:48 am
Thanked: 27 times
GMAT Score:740

by 2010gmat » Mon Apr 27, 2009 10:12 am
perfect dude...thanks a lot!
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
MBA Student
Posts: 1194
Joined: Sat Aug 16, 2008 9:42 pmFollowed by: 17 members
Location: Paris, France
Thanked: 71 times
GMAT Score:710

by gmat740 » Mon Apr 27, 2009 6:27 pm
I solved this in a different way.

I would do this as we do evaluate the argument.I will ask question for each of the option.
B) rely on the opinions of established authorities
if they rely on authorities, can they resolve? certainly no,we don't know what views authorities have
D) present supporting data
So one presents data about worker and the other gives data about the natural resources.....so can they resolve? No

Use similar approach and you will land up with A

Hope this helps
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 100
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2014 4:32 am

by ashley.com » Sun May 15, 2016 3:48 am
Answer A seems to be logical one out of other answer choices
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1