Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

In the United States proven oil reserves

Expert replies
by BTGmoderatorDC » Fri Nov 17, 2017 5:10 am
In the United States proven oil reserves—the amount of oil considered extractable from known fields—are at the same level as they were ten years ago. Yet over this same period no new oil fields of any consequence have been discovered, and the annual consumption of domestically produced oil has increased.

Which one of the following, if true, best reconciles the discrepancy described above?

(A) Over the past decade the annual consumption of imported oil has increased more rapidly than that of domestic oil in the United States.
(B) Conservation measures have lowered the rate of growth of domestic oil consumption from what it was a decade ago.
(C) Oil exploration in the United States has slowed due to increased concern over the environmental impact of such exploration.
(D) The price of domestically produced oil has fallen substantially over the past decade.
(E) Due to technological advances over the last decade, much oil previously considered unextractable is now considered extractable.

How can i find the best Option?

OA E
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by EconomistGMATTutor » Fri Nov 17, 2017 6:55 am
The discrepancy:
1) The amount of oil considered extractable from known fields is at the same level as it was ten years ago, and YET . . .
2) No new oil fields have been discovered, and the annual consumption of oil has increased.

We need to show that both of these two statements can be true. You might think that with no new oil fields and an increase in consumption, the amount of extractable oil would NOT be the same as it was ten years ago - it would be less.

Choice A: This makes an irrelevant comparison between imported and domestic oil consumption.
Choice B: This statement says that the growth rate of oil consumption has lowered, but this means that it's still growing. Again, you'd think that the amount of oil would be less than before.
Choice C: This refers to oil exploration, which is not directly relevant to the argument.
Choice D: Okay, the price has fallen. How does this impact oil consumption? The choice doesn't say, so it's not directly relevant to the discrepancy we're examining.
Choice E is correct. If you look at Statement 1 above, it says that the amount of extractable oil hasn't changed. This answer choice tells us that while it's true that there aren't more oil fields, and it's true that consumption has increased, it's also true that more of the existing oil can now be extracted due to technological improvements.

I'm available if you'd like to follow up on this question.
GMAT Prep From The Economist
We offer 70+ point score improvement money back guarantee.
Our average student improves 98 points.

Image
Join the discussion

by BTGmoderatorDC » Wed Jan 10, 2018 9:48 pm
EconomistGMATTutor wrote:The discrepancy:
1) The amount of oil considered extractable from known fields is at the same level as it was ten years ago, and YET . . .
2) No new oil fields have been discovered, and the annual consumption of oil has increased.

We need to show that both of these two statements can be true. You might think that with no new oil fields and an increase in consumption, the amount of extractable oil would NOT be the same as it was ten years ago - it would be less.

Choice A: This makes an irrelevant comparison between imported and domestic oil consumption.
Choice B: This statement says that the growth rate of oil consumption has lowered, but this means that it's still growing. Again, you'd think that the amount of oil would be less than before.
Choice C: This refers to oil exploration, which is not directly relevant to the argument.
Choice D: Okay, the price has fallen. How does this impact oil consumption? The choice doesn't say, so it's not directly relevant to the discrepancy we're examining.
Choice E is correct. If you look at Statement 1 above, it says that the amount of extractable oil hasn't changed. This answer choice tells us that while it's true that there aren't more oil fields, and it's true that consumption has increased, it's also true that more of the existing oil can now be extracted due to technological improvements.

I'm available if you'd like to follow up on this question.
Thanks a lot!
Join the discussion