Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

In the United States, of the people who moved [CR]

Expert replies
by chocoswiss » Mon Oct 25, 2010 2:59 am
In the United States, of the people who moved from one state to another when they retired, the percentage who retired to Florida has decreased by three percentage points over the past ten years. Since many local businesses in Florida cater to retirees, this decline is likely to have a noticeably negative economic effect on these businesses.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?
A. Florida attracts more people who move from one state to another when they retire than does any other state.
B. The number of people who move out of Florida to accept employment in other states has increased over the past ten years.
C. There are far more local businesses in Florida that cater to tourists than there are local businesses that cater to retirees.
D. The total number of people who retired and moved to another state for their retirement has increased significantly over the past ten years.
E. The number of people who left Florida when they retired to live in another state was greater last year than it was ten years ago.


Source: Gmat Prep
OA is D

why is A incorrect?

Thanks!
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by chocoswiss » Mon Oct 25, 2010 5:00 pm
please help!
exam in 3 days :(
Join the discussion

by rkanthilal » Mon Oct 25, 2010 5:58 pm
The premises are:

1) In the United States, of the people who moved from one state to another when they retired, the percentage who retired to Florida has decreased by three percentage points over the past ten years.
2) Many local businesses in Florida cater to retirees

The conclusion is:

1) This decline is likely to have a noticeably negative economic effect on these businesses

This argument confuses percentages and numbers. The premises refer to the percentage of retires moving to Florida. The conclusion assumes that since the percentage decreased by 3 points the total number of retirees decreased and thus it is negative for business. This does not have to be the case. If the total number of retirees in the country increases, then Florida’s share in number may still go up even though their percentage went down. In other words, if the pie gets bigger your smaller share of the pie may still result in a bigger slice than you previously had.

Consider the following,

Before After
Nationwide Retirees 10,000 100,000
Florida’s Share 30% 27%

Total Number of
Retirees in Florida 3000 27,000

In this example, even though Florida’s share went down 3% the number of retirees increased substantially since the total number of retirees nationwide increased. Answer choice D refers to this. This clearly weakens the conclusion that the 3 percentage point decrease is bad for business.
Join the discussion

by rkanthilal » Mon Oct 25, 2010 6:12 pm
Sorry I just saw your question regarding answer A. Answer A doesn't weaken the conclusion.

The conclusion is that the percentage point decrease in people retiring to Florida is likely to have a noticeably negative economic effect on business. Even if "Florida attracts more people who move from one state to another when they retire than does any other state", the total number of retirees living in Florida can still be less than it was than it was 10 years ago since their "market share" decreased by 3 points. (This would be true if the total number "market" of retirees stayed the same or went down.) If the number of retirees is lower then the conclusion that the percentage decrease is negative for business would hold.

Hope this helps...
Join the discussion

by chocoswiss » Mon Oct 25, 2010 9:05 pm
much clearer, thank u
yes, i was battling between A & D
Join the discussion

by Nedaari » Fri Aug 12, 2011 4:47 pm
Wow. Great explanation. Thanks.
Join the discussion