• Free Trial & Practice Exam
BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Magoosh
Study with Magoosh GMAT prep

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Free Practice Test & Review
How would you score if you took the GMAT

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• 5-Day Free Trial
5-day free, full-access trial TTP Quant

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Most awarded test prep in the world
Now free for 30 days

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• 1 Hour Free
BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Award-winning private GMAT tutoring
Register now and save up to $200 Available with Beat the GMAT members only code • Free Veritas GMAT Class Experience Lesson 1 Live Free Available with Beat the GMAT members only code • 5 Day FREE Trial Study Smarter, Not Harder Available with Beat the GMAT members only code • Get 300+ Practice Questions 25 Video lessons and 6 Webinars for FREE Available with Beat the GMAT members only code In Colorado subalpine meadows This topic has 3 expert replies and 4 member replies gmatdriller Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts Joined 04 Jul 2010 Posted: 418 messages Followed by: 2 members Upvotes: 6 In Colorado subalpine meadows Mon Aug 03, 2015 6:22 pm In Colorado subalpine meadows, non-native dandelions co-occur with a native flower, the larkspur. Bumblebees visit both species, creating the potential for interactions between the two species with respect to pollination. In a recent study, researchers selected 6 plots containing both species; all dandelions were removed from eight plots; the remaining eight control plots were left undisturbed. The control plots yielded significantly more larkspur seeds than the dandelion- free plots, leading the researchers to conclude that the presence of dandelions facilitates pollination (and hence, seed production) in the native species by attractive more pollinators to the mixed plots. Which of the following, if true, mostly undermines the researchersâ€™ reasoning? A: Bumblebees preferentially visit dandelions over larkspurs in mixed plots B: In mixed plots, pollinators can transfer pollen from one species to another to augment seed production C: If left unchecked, non-native species like dandelions quickly crowd out native species D: Seed germination is a more reliable measure of a speciesâ€™ fitness than seed production E: Soil disturbances can result in fewer blooms, and hence lower seed production @ GmatGuru, Jim@Stratusprep, & Brent@GmatpreNow...many thanks for your contributions to my previous cr questions. Above question is similar to A causes B, and we are asked to weaken. The question appears confusing with plenty words but simple after careful analysis. Eliminating Alternative cause GMAT/MBA Expert DavidG@VeritasPrep Legendary Member Joined 14 Jan 2015 Posted: 2613 messages Followed by: 118 members Upvotes: 1153 GMAT Score: 770 Thu Jun 22, 2017 6:53 am jabhatta wrote: Hi - please let me know where i might be going wrong here --------------- E : Soil disturbances can result in fewer blooms, and hence lower seed production My interpretation of E : because of disturbances in the soil specifically , fewer blooms (aka dandelion plants) are produced --hence even lower seeds are produced Goal : weaken the argument which states dandelions facilitates pollination and seed production (not necessarily seed yield) Question : just because soil disturbances result in fewer blooms (fewer grown Dandelion plants)...... why does this imply, Dandelions do not facilitate pollination ...... Imagine that scientists hypothesize that Drug X can extend the lifespan of gerbils. So they do an experiment. They give one set of gerbils Drug X and they give another set a placebo. The gerbils given Drug X live five months longer than the gerbils given the placebo. So the drug looks good, right? Well, what if it turns out that the placebo contains lethal amounts of poison. Suddenly, weâ€™d have an alternative explanation: rather than Drug X being effective, the placebo was actually shortening life expectancy. Does this prove that Drug X doesnâ€™t work? No. But it surely hurts the argument that it does. Same logic here. We're told that the plots with both types of flowers had greater yields of larkspur seeds. One explanation is that the presence of dandelions improved the larkspur seed yields in the plots containing both. An alternative explanation, offered by E, is that the disturbance caused by removing the dandelions hurt the seed yields in the plots with only larkspur. (In this case, disturbing the soil is analogous to the presence of poison in the placebo - it's a variable that contaminates the purity of the experiment.) Does it mean that dandelions canâ€™t help yields? No. But it certainly weakens that argument that they do. _________________ Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor Veritas Prep Reviews Save$100 off any live Veritas Prep GMAT Course

Enroll in a Veritas Prep GMAT class completely for FREE. Wondering if a GMAT course is right for you? Attend the first class session of an actual GMAT course, either in-person or live online, and see for yourself why so many students choose to work with Veritas Prep. Find a class now!
Pratishtha21 Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Joined
01 Jul 2017
Posted:
32 messages
Sat Jul 01, 2017 7:55 pm
A: Bumblebees preferentially visit dandelions over larkspurs in mixed plots - INCORRECT- this is the conclusion of the passage.
B: In mixed plots, pollinators can transfer pollen from one species to another to augment seed production - Yes. So? It is mere a fact.- INCORRECT-
C: If left unchecked, non-native species like dandelions quickly crowd out native species -INCORRECT- Again, it has nothing to do with the argument
D: Seed germination is a more reliable measure of a speciesâ€™ fitness than seed production - INCORRECT- same as D
E: Soil disturbances can result in fewer blooms, and hence lower seed production - YES! this is the right choice. Now, the author says that the bees are attracted to dandelions and more pollination happens in the mixed plots becoz of that. But if E were true, then we know that the plot where dandelions were removed had disturbed soil and due to this, there was lower pollination and hence lower seed production.

bubbliiiiiiii Legendary Member
Joined
14 Apr 2009
Posted:
971 messages
Followed by:
12 members
49
Test Date:
18.10.2012
Target GMAT Score:
760
GMAT Score:
700
Tue Aug 04, 2015 4:00 am
gmatdriller wrote:
In Colorado subalpine meadows, non-native dandelions co-occur with a native flower, the larkspur. Bumblebees visit both species, creating the potential for interactions between the two species with respect to pollination. In a recent study, researchers selected 6 plots containing both species; all dandelions were removed from eight plots; the remaining eight control plots were left undisturbed. The control plots yielded significantly more larkspur seeds than the dandelion- free plots, leading the researchers to conclude that the presence of dandelions facilitates pollination (and hence, seed production) in the native species by attractive more pollinators to the mixed plots.

Which of the following, if true, mostly undermines the researchersâ€™ reasoning?

A: Bumblebees preferentially visit dandelions over larkspurs in mixed plots
B: In mixed plots, pollinators can transfer pollen from one species to another to augment seed production
C: If left unchecked, non-native species like dandelions quickly crowd out native species
D: Seed germination is a more reliable measure of a speciesâ€™ fitness than seed production
E: Soil disturbances can result in fewer blooms, and hence lower seed production

@ GmatGuru, Jim@Stratusprep, & Brent@GmatpreNow...many thanks for your contributions to my previous cr questions.

Above question is similar to A causes B, and we are asked to weaken. The question appears confusing with plenty words but simple after careful analysis. Eliminating Alternative cause
Core:

P1: Two species of flowers are grown simultaneously.
P2: BBees are pollinators for both these species.
P3: Recent study indicates plot with mixed species yielded significantly nor L seeds than D free plots.
C: Presence of Dandelion facilitates seed productions by attracting more pollinators.

Question type:

Weaken ... there are three ways to deal with it.

1. A reverse logic should exist i.e., Dandelion are grown because of more pollinators -> does not make sense.
2. It's just a coincidence
3. Provide an alternative cause.

Lets evaluate options.

A: Bumblebees preferentially visit dandelions over larkspurs in mixed plots
This is the conclusion - Eliminate.

B: In mixed plots, pollinators can transfer pollen from one species to another to augment seed production.
Not sure of what it is .. so will keep it for now.

C: If left unchecked, non-native species like dandelions quickly crowd out native species
If this was the case then more Dandelion seeds than larkspur seeds should have been created.

D: Seed germination is a more reliable measure of a speciesâ€™ fitness than seed production
Out of context since we are dealing with seed production here.

E: Soil disturbances can result in fewer blooms, and hence lower seed production

Thus, by POE, IMO B.

_________________
Regards,

Pranay

GMAT/MBA Expert

GMATGuruNY GMAT Instructor
Joined
25 May 2010
Posted:
13901 messages
Followed by:
1808 members
13060
GMAT Score:
790
Tue Aug 04, 2015 6:28 am
gmatdriller wrote:
In Colorado subalpine meadows, non-native dandelions co-occur with a native flower, the larkspur. Bumblebees visit both species, creating the potential for interactions between the two species with respect to pollination. In a recent study, researchers selected 6 plots containing both species; all dandelions were removed from eight plots; the remaining eight control plots were left undisturbed. The control plots yielded significantly more larkspur seeds than the dandelion- free plots, leading the researchers to conclude that the presence of dandelions facilitates pollination (and hence, seed production) in the native species by attractive more pollinators to the mixed plots.

Which of the following, if true, mostly undermines the researchersâ€™ reasoning?

A: Bumblebees preferentially visit dandelions over larkspurs in mixed plots
B: In mixed plots, pollinators can transfer pollen from one species to another to augment seed production
C: If left unchecked, non-native species like dandelions quickly crowd out native species
D: Seed germination is a more reliable measure of a speciesâ€™ fitness than seed production
E: Soil disturbances can result in fewer blooms, and hence lower seed production[/b]
Premise:
After dandelions were removed from 8 plots, these 8 plots yielded fewer larkspur seeds than did the control plots.
Conclusion:
The presence of dandelions facilitates pollination.

The assumption is that there is NO OTHER EXPLANATION for the lower seed yield in the 8 plots from which dandelions were removed.
One way to weaken the conclusion is to suggest an ALTERNATE EXPLANATION for the lower seed yield in these 8 plots.

Answer choice E: Soil disturbances can result in fewer blooms, and hence lower seed production.
Implication:
The lower seed yield in the 8 plots was due NOT to the absence of dandelions but to the SOIL DISTURBANCE that occurred when the dandelions were removed, WEAKENING the conclusion that the presence of dandelions facilitates pollination.

_________________
Mitch Hunt
GMAT Private Tutor
GMATGuruNY@gmail.com
If you find one of my posts helpful, please take a moment to click on the "UPVOTE" icon.
Available for tutoring in NYC and long-distance.

Free GMAT Practice Test How can you improve your test score if you don't know your baseline score? Take a free online practice exam. Get started on achieving your dream score today! Sign up now.
gmat_for_life Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Joined
26 Jun 2015
Posted:
75 messages
Tue Jan 26, 2016 3:08 am
Hello Mitch,

One question here...

How do we know that soil disturbances occurred when the dandelions were removed? This can possibly be implied but cannot be confirmed I guess?

Many Thanks,
Amit

GMAT/MBA Expert

GMATGuruNY GMAT Instructor
Joined
25 May 2010
Posted:
13901 messages
Followed by:
1808 members
13060
GMAT Score:
790
Tue Jan 26, 2016 7:10 am
gmat_for_life wrote:
Hello Mitch,

One question here...

How do we know that soil disturbances occurred when the dandelions were removed? This can possibly be implied but cannot be confirmed I guess?

Many Thanks,
Amit
From the passage:
All dandelions were removed from eight plots; the remaining eight control plots were left UNDISTURBED.
Implication:
Whereas the control plots were left UNDISTURBED, the other eight plots WERE disturbed.
How were they disturbed?
By the removal of the dandelions.

_________________
Mitch Hunt
GMAT Private Tutor
GMATGuruNY@gmail.com
If you find one of my posts helpful, please take a moment to click on the "UPVOTE" icon.
Available for tutoring in NYC and long-distance.

Free GMAT Practice Test How can you improve your test score if you don't know your baseline score? Take a free online practice exam. Get started on achieving your dream score today! Sign up now.
jabhatta Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Joined
22 May 2014
Posted:
18 messages
Thu Jun 15, 2017 1:25 pm
Hi - please let me know where i might be going wrong here

---------------

E : Soil disturbances can result in fewer blooms, and hence lower seed production

My interpretation of E : because of disturbances in the soil specifically , fewer blooms (aka dandelion plants) are produced --hence even lower seeds are produced

Goal : weaken the argument which states dandelions facilitates pollination and seed production (not necessarily seed yield)

Question : just because soil disturbances result in fewer blooms (fewer grown Dandelion plants)...... why does this imply, Dandelions do not facilitate pollination ......

Best Conversation Starters

1 lheiannie07 112 topics
2 ardz24 71 topics
3 Roland2rule 69 topics
4 LUANDATO 53 topics
5 swerve 45 topics
See More Top Beat The GMAT Members...

Most Active Experts

1 GMATGuruNY

The Princeton Review Teacher

154 posts
2 Rich.C@EMPOWERgma...

EMPOWERgmat

107 posts
3 Jeff@TargetTestPrep

Target Test Prep

106 posts
4 Scott@TargetTestPrep

Target Test Prep

98 posts
5 EconomistGMATTutor

The Economist GMAT Tutor

91 posts
See More Top Beat The GMAT Experts