In April 1997, Hillary Rodham Clinton hosted an all-day White House scientific conference on new findings that indicates a child's acquiring language, thinking, and emotional skills as an active process that may be largely completed before age three.
A) that indicates a child's acquiring language, thinking, and emotional skills as
B) that are indicative of a child acquiring language, thinking, and emotional skills as
C) to indicate that when a child acquires language, thinking, and emotional skills, that it is
D) indicating that a child's acquisition of language, thinking, and emotional skills is
E) indicative of a child's acquisition of language, thinking, and emotional skills as
5-Day Free Trial
5-day free, full-access trial TTP
Available with Beat the GMAT members only code
MORE DETAILS
In April 1997, Hillary Rodham Clinton hosted an all-day
This topic has expert replies
-
BTGmoderatorDC
- Moderator
- Posts: 7187
- Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2017 4:43 pm
- Followed by:23 members
Timer
00:00
Your Answer
A
B
C
D
E
Global Stats
-
deloitte247
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 2214
- Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2018 2:22 pm
- Followed by:5 members
Timer
00:00
Your Answer
A
B
C
D
E
Global Stats
In this options below we need to critically check them one after the other so we can get a better idea of how it'd be.
In Option A - INCORRECT. We have a situation where the writer's opinion on the question is what's written in the original question without proper analysis. It doesn't give us the necessary insight as to how to answer questions logically.
From Option B - INCORRECT. The solution here lacks grammatical correctness in that the ''child'' should bear a possessive mark of apostrophe to show whom is being talked about with the skills so to say.
In Option C - INCORRECT.This statement doesn't show that the conference has been held. The use of the preposition ''to'' shows that it is a supposition. It appears like an arrangement made for the future.
From Option D - INCORRECT. We can notice a slight change in the sentence formation which would have been correct too but for the inexcusable use of a singular verb ''is'' during the course of enumeration of the active parts of the sentence. You don't even mention Skills and use the verb ''is'', it's an offence.
Let's look further to Option E - CORRECT, as to get what it has to offer too. This doesn't appear as a supposed statement because all its part are in agreement with the integrity of the argument. It is the most appropriate here.
In Option A - INCORRECT. We have a situation where the writer's opinion on the question is what's written in the original question without proper analysis. It doesn't give us the necessary insight as to how to answer questions logically.
From Option B - INCORRECT. The solution here lacks grammatical correctness in that the ''child'' should bear a possessive mark of apostrophe to show whom is being talked about with the skills so to say.
In Option C - INCORRECT.This statement doesn't show that the conference has been held. The use of the preposition ''to'' shows that it is a supposition. It appears like an arrangement made for the future.
From Option D - INCORRECT. We can notice a slight change in the sentence formation which would have been correct too but for the inexcusable use of a singular verb ''is'' during the course of enumeration of the active parts of the sentence. You don't even mention Skills and use the verb ''is'', it's an offence.
Let's look further to Option E - CORRECT, as to get what it has to offer too. This doesn't appear as a supposed statement because all its part are in agreement with the integrity of the argument. It is the most appropriate here.
