BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Scientists who endeavor to explain the way scientific work

This topic has expert replies
Post new topic Locked
Previous Topic Next Topic
Moderator
Posts: 7187
Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2017 4:43 pm
Followed by:23 members

Scientists who endeavor to explain the way scientific work

by BTGmoderatorDC » Thu Jun 07, 2018 4:23 pm

Timer

00:00

Your Answer

A

B

C

D

E

Global Stats

Scientists who endeavor to explain the way scientific work was done in the laboratories of the seventeenth-century chemists, must address a fundamental inconsistency between the way such experiments were actually performed and the way the seventeenth-century rhetoric describing them

A. Scientists who endeavor to explain the way scientific work was done in the laboratories of the seventeenth-century chemists, must address a fundamental inconsistency between the way such experiments were actually performed and the way the seventeenth-century rhetoric describing them

B. Scientists who endeavor to explain how scientific work was done in the laboratories of the seventeenth-century chemists, and must address the fundamental inconsistency in the way such experiments were actually performed and the way the seventeenth-century rhetoric described them

C. Scientists endeavoring to explain how scientific work was done in the laboratories of the seventeenth-century chemists, and who must address a fundamental inconsistency distorting the actual manner of such experiments from the description by the seventeenth-century rhetoric.

D. Scientists endeavoring to explain how scientific work was done in the laboratories of the seventeenth-century chemists, must address a fundamental inconsistency of the actual manner of such experiments and the way the seventeenth-century rhetoric described it

E. Scientists who endeavor to explain how scientific work was done in the laboratories of the seventeenth-century chemists, must address a fundamental inconsistency between how such experiments were actually performed and how the same were described by the seventeenth-century rhetoric
Top
Source: — Sentence Correction |
Legendary Member
Posts: 2214
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2018 2:22 pm
Followed by:5 members

by deloitte247 » Fri Jun 15, 2018 2:40 pm

Timer

00:00

Your Answer

A

B

C

D

E

Global Stats

However technically an article may be and most still be analysed critically in order to solving the question.

In Option A - INCORRECT. There is a situation of ineffective language use in the form of a continuous verb ''describing'' even though the article was about seventeenth century laboratory work. It is also a lifted response from the article.

In Option B - INCORRECT. We must try to pay attention to every word involved in this statement. For an instance, the pronoun ''them'' was used in this option as a replacement word though the position and manner makes it look like it was modifying the scientists which in actual term is not.

In Option C. The use of ''endeavoring'' here is not suitable at all in that it's a verb that's been used in a continuous form even when all the other verb parts explained the statement in their past tense.

Option D - INCORRECT. Here, two words have been caught to fall off the normal sentence formation. The first is ''endeavoring'' which has been explained in the Option C above, the second being the pronoun ''it'' which describes a single item which will not qualify the plural form of ''experiments'' that's been used.

In Option E - CORRECT. Here, the keywords so explained front previous options are in their right forms. Example is ''described'', so also is ''were'' all consistent with the article explanation. This statement' analysis is appropriate enough because it has been re-written in the form prescribed by the writer.
Top
Post new topic Locked
• Page 1 of 1