In an election with only two candidates, before absentee ballots were counted candidate Jones received a votes and candidate Smith received b votes. If 900,000 non-absentee votes were cast, what was the percent change in the number of votes after the counting of absentee ballots?
(1) Candidate Jones received 43% of the votes cast before absentee ballots were counted and received 43% after absentee ballots were counted.
(2) Candidate Smith received 57% of the votes cast both before and after absentee ballots were counted and received 387,000 votes after absentee ballots were counted.
OAB
5-Day Free Trial
5-day free, full-access trial TTP
Available with Beat the GMAT members only code
MORE DETAILS
In an election with only two candidates, before absentee
This topic has expert replies
-
vinay1983
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 643
- Joined: Wed Aug 14, 2013 4:27 am
- Thanked: 48 times
- Followed by:7 members
Don't get mad at me, but on the face of it since I could not understand the question my answer is E.guerrero wrote:In an election with only two candidates, before absentee ballots were counted candidate Jones received a votes and candidate Smith received b votes. If 900,000 non-absentee votes were cast, what was the percent change in the number of votes after the counting of absentee ballots?
(1) Candidate Jones received 43% of the votes cast before absentee ballots were counted and received 43% after absentee ballots were counted.
(2) Candidate Smith received 57% of the votes cast both before and after absentee ballots were counted and received 387,000 votes after absentee ballots were counted.
OAB
Did not make sense
You can, for example never foretell what any one man will do, but you can say with precision what an average number will be up to!
-
Java_85
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 234
- Joined: Tue Jul 16, 2013 9:00 am
- Location: West Virginia
- Thanked: 9 times
IMO E Here is why:
(1) just gives the percentage and we don't have any idea about the number of votes. so can't solve it --> B C E
(2) Smith have 57% of votes before and after receiving 387,000 votes.
If the percentage wants to stay the same after adding new votes then the ratio of a/b should stay the same i.e. (a/b)=43/57=?/387000 ==> We can say how many new votes are for Jones. Let's call new jones votes Jn
assume x is the number of votes before and 57% of it is for Smith,
Total votes after = x+387000+ Jn?
Total votes before+ 900,000 ==> You can calculate the percentage change --> B is sufficient.
Hope this helps.
(1) just gives the percentage and we don't have any idea about the number of votes. so can't solve it --> B C E
(2) Smith have 57% of votes before and after receiving 387,000 votes.
If the percentage wants to stay the same after adding new votes then the ratio of a/b should stay the same i.e. (a/b)=43/57=?/387000 ==> We can say how many new votes are for Jones. Let's call new jones votes Jn
assume x is the number of votes before and 57% of it is for Smith,
Total votes after = x+387000+ Jn?
Total votes before+ 900,000 ==> You can calculate the percentage change --> B is sufficient.
Hope this helps.
GMAT/MBA Expert
-
ceilidh.erickson
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 2095
- Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2012 3:22 pm
- Thanked: 1443 times
- Followed by:247 members
Since we're given the original number of votes cast, then in order to find the percent change in number of votes cast, we need a way to find the number of absentee ballots.
1) As Java pointed out, this gives us only PROPORTIONAL information. It's saying that this candidate won the same percentage of absentee ballots as he/she did original votes. This could be true if there were 100 absentee ballots or 1,000,000. It tells us nothing about number. Insufficient.
If we want to express this algebraically (using "V" for original votes and "A" for absentee votes), Jones' vote total can be expressed as:
0.43V + 0.43A
0.43(900,000) + 0.43A
The problem is that we don't have anything to set this equal to, so we can't solve.
2) This statement gives us both PROPORTIONAL and NUMERIC information, which makes a big difference! If Smith received 57% of the original votes and 57% of the absentee votes, then we could express Smith's absentee votes as:
0.57A = 387,000
(Don't actually do the math here to solve for A - just know that it can be done!)
This will give us a value for the absentee ballots, which means that we'll be able to find percent change. Sufficient.
It can be helpful on a lot of percent/fraction/ratio problems to think in terms of PROPORTIONAL info vs REAL NUMBER info.
1) As Java pointed out, this gives us only PROPORTIONAL information. It's saying that this candidate won the same percentage of absentee ballots as he/she did original votes. This could be true if there were 100 absentee ballots or 1,000,000. It tells us nothing about number. Insufficient.
If we want to express this algebraically (using "V" for original votes and "A" for absentee votes), Jones' vote total can be expressed as:
0.43V + 0.43A
0.43(900,000) + 0.43A
The problem is that we don't have anything to set this equal to, so we can't solve.
2) This statement gives us both PROPORTIONAL and NUMERIC information, which makes a big difference! If Smith received 57% of the original votes and 57% of the absentee votes, then we could express Smith's absentee votes as:
0.57A = 387,000
(Don't actually do the math here to solve for A - just know that it can be done!)
This will give us a value for the absentee ballots, which means that we'll be able to find percent change. Sufficient.
It can be helpful on a lot of percent/fraction/ratio problems to think in terms of PROPORTIONAL info vs REAL NUMBER info.
Ceilidh Erickson
EdM in Mind, Brain, and Education
Harvard Graduate School of Education
EdM in Mind, Brain, and Education
Harvard Graduate School of Education
