BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

I am not sure how to use elimination here

Expert replies
Source: — Problem Solving |

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Mon Apr 28, 2014 5:19 am
[email protected] wrote:228/494 =


A) 4/7
B) 11/21
C) 6/13
D) 14/27
E) 9/17
Notice that 247/494 = 1/2, so 228/494 must be LESS THAN 1/2

Now check the answer choices:

A) 4/7 Since 3.5/7 = 1/2, we can see that 4/7 is greater than 1/2. So ELIMINATE A
B) 11/21 Since 10.5/21 = 1/2, we can see that 11/21 is greater than 1/2. So ELIMINATE B
C) 6/13 This is LESS THAN than 1/2, so Keep C
D) 14/27 Since 13.5/27= 1/2, we can see that 14/27 is greater than 1/2. So ELIMINATE D
E) 9/17 Since 8.5/17 = 1/2, we can see that 9/17 is greater than 1/2. So ELIMINATE E

By the process of elimination, the correct answer must be C

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Join the discussion

by Matt@VeritasPrep » Tue Apr 29, 2014 1:56 pm
Another approach:

228 and 494 are both even, so let's simplify by 2.

228/494 = 114/247

Now let's factor 114 = 2 * 57 = 2 * 3 * 19.

Noticing that 247 doesn't divide by 2 or 3, we conclude it must be divide by 19, and it does! (247 = 13 * 19).

Hence 228/494 = 114/247 = (6*19)/(13*19) = 6/13.
Join the discussion

Re:

by kirin » Fri Mar 20, 2020 7:30 am
notice that your approach requires me to be a human calculator capable of easily calculating 2*3*19=247 , wow super easy approach that would only take 3 mins to implement, thanks!
Matt@VeritasPrep wrote: ↑
Tue Apr 29, 2014 1:56 pm
Another approach:

228 and 494 are both even, so let's simplify by 2.

228/494 = 114/247

Now let's factor 114 = 2 * 57 = 2 * 3 * 19.

Noticing that 247 doesn't divide by 2 or 3, we conclude it must be divide by 19, and it does! (247 = 13 * 19).

Hence 228/494 = 114/247 = (6*19)/(13*19) = 6/13.
Join the discussion

[email protected] wrote: ↑
Mon Apr 28, 2014 3:55 am
228/494 =


4/7
11/21
6/13
14/27
9/17

Ans-C
228/494 = 114/247 = (6 x 19)/(13 x 19) = 6/13

Answer: C

Scott Woodbury-Stewart
Founder and CEO
[email protected]

Image

See why Target Test Prep is rated 5 out of 5 stars on BEAT the GMAT. Read our reviews

ImageImage
Join the discussion