BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

For the students in a Physical Fitness Class Section #1, the

Expert replies
by subh2273 » Sun Oct 07, 2018 10:57 pm

Timer

00:00

Answers

A

B

C

D

E

Stats

Difficulty—

For the students in a Physical Fitness Class Section #1, the range of their weights is R kg and the highest amount of weight is X kg. For the students in Physical Fitness Class Section #2, the range of their weights is S kg and the highest amount of weight is Y kg. Is the lowest weight of the students in Section #1 greater than the lowest weight of the students in Section #2 ?

(1) R < S

(2) X > Y
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

subh2273 wrote:For the students in a Physical Fitness Class Section #1, the range of their weights is R kg and the highest amount of weight is X kg. For the students in Physical Fitness Class Section #2, the range of their weights is S kg and the highest amount of weight is Y kg. Is the lowest weight of the students in Section #1 greater than the lowest weight of the students in Section #2 ?

(1) R < S

(2) X > Y
\[{\text{range}} = {V_{\max }} - {V_{\min }}\,\,\,\,\,\, \Rightarrow \,\,\,\,\,\,{V_{\min }} = {V_{\max }} - {\text{range}}\]
Section 1: weights have minimum value (X-R) kg and maximum value X kg.
Section 2: weights have minimum value (Y-S) kg and maximum Y kg.
\[X - R\,\,\,\mathop > \limits^? \,\,Y - S\]
\[\left( 1 \right)\,\,R < S\,\,\,\,\,\,\left\{ \begin{gathered}
\,{\text{Take}}\,\,\left( {X,R,Y,S} \right) = \,\left( {90,10,90,20} \right)\,\,\,\,\, \Rightarrow \,\,\,\,\left\langle {{\text{YES}}} \right\rangle \,\,\,\,\,\,\left( {80\,\,\mathop > \limits^? \,70} \right) \hfill \\
\,{\text{Take}}\,\,\left( {X,R,Y,S} \right) = \,\left( {80,10,90,20} \right)\,\,\,\,\, \Rightarrow \,\,\,\,\left\langle {{\text{NO}}} \right\rangle \,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\left( {70\,\,\mathop > \limits^? \,70} \right) \hfill \\
\end{gathered} \right.\]
\[\left( 2 \right)\,\,X > Y\,\,\,\,\,\left\{ \begin{gathered}
\,{\text{Take}}\,\,\left( {X,R,Y,S} \right) = \,\left( {90,10,80,10} \right)\,\,\,\,\, \Rightarrow \,\,\,\,\left\langle {{\text{YES}}} \right\rangle \,\,\,\,\,\,\left( {80\,\,\mathop > \limits^? \,70} \right) \hfill \\
\,{\text{Take}}\,\,\left( {X,R,Y,S} \right) = \,\left( {90,20,80,10} \right)\,\,\,\,\, \Rightarrow \,\,\,\,\left\langle {{\text{NO}}} \right\rangle \,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\left( {70\,\,\mathop > \limits^? \,70} \right) \hfill \\
\end{gathered} \right.\]
\[\left( {1 + 2} \right)\,\,\,\,\left\{ \begin{gathered}
\,\,R < S\,\,\, \Rightarrow \,\,\,\, - R > - S \hfill \\
\,\,X > Y \hfill \\
\end{gathered} \right.\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\mathop \Rightarrow \limits^{\left( + \right)} \,\,\,\,\,\,\,X + \left( { - R} \right)\,\, > \,\,Y + \left( { - S} \right)\,\,\,\,\, \Rightarrow \,\,\,\left\langle {{\text{YES}}} \right\rangle \,\]

The correct answer is therefore (C).

This solution follows the notations and rationale taught in the GMATH method.

Regards,
Fabio.
Fabio Skilnik :: GMATH method creator ( Math for the GMAT)
English-speakers :: https://www.gmath.net
Portuguese-speakers :: https://www.gmath.com.br
Join the discussion

by Jay@ManhattanReview » Wed Oct 10, 2018 9:33 pm
subh2273 wrote:For the students in a Physical Fitness Class Section #1, the range of their weights is R kg and the highest amount of weight is X kg. For the students in Physical Fitness Class Section #2, the range of their weights is S kg and the highest amount of weight is Y kg. Is the lowest weight of the students in Section #1 greater than the lowest weight of the students in Section #2 ?

(1) R < S

(2) X > Y
Given:

"¢ Section 1: Range = R; Highest weight = X, thus, Lowest weight = X - R
"¢ Section 2: Range = S; Highest weight = Y, thus, Lowest weight = Y - S

Question: Is X - R > Y - S?

Let's take each statement one by one.

(1) R < S

Case 1: If X > Y, then X - R > Y - S => X - Y > R - S => |X - Y| > -|R - S|, which is ALWAYS correct, irespective of values of X, Y, R, and S.
Case 2: If X < Y, then X - R > Y - S => X - Y > R - S => -|X - Y| > -|R - S|, which is NOT necessarily correct since both |X - Y| and |R - S| are negative numbers, they cannot be compared untill we have their unique values.

Insufficient.

(2) X > Y

As with Statement 1, same with Statement 2. Insufficient.

(1) and (2) together

Case 1 discussed in Statement 1 is applicable, thus, X - R > Y - S. The answer is Yes. Sufficient.

The correct answer: C

Hope this helps!

-Jay
_________________
Manhattan Review GMAT Prep

Locations: New York | Bangalore | Guangzhou | Buenos Aires | and many more...

Schedule your free consultation with an experienced GMAT Prep Advisor! Click here.
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Thu Oct 11, 2018 2:22 am
subh2273 wrote:For the students in a Physical Fitness Class Section #1, the range of their weights is R kg and the highest amount of weight is X kg. For the students in Physical Fitness Class Section #2, the range of their weights is S kg and the highest amount of weight is Y kg. Is the lowest weight of the students in Section #1 greater than the lowest weight of the students in Section #2 ?

(1) R < S

(2) X > Y
Range = highest - lowest.
Thus:
Lowest = highest - range.

In Section 1, lowest = highest - range = X-R.
In Section 2, lowest = highest - range = Y-S.

If the lowest weight in Section 1 is greater than the lowest weight in Section 2, we get:
X-R > Y-S
X+S > Y+R.

Question rephrased: Is X+S > Y+R?

Statement 1: R < S
No information about X or Y.
INSUFFICIENT.

Statement 2: X > Y
No information about R or S.
INSUFFICIENT.

Statements combined:
Inequalities can be ADDED TOGETHER.
When we add, the < > must face the SAME DIRECTION in each inequality.
To match X > Y in statement 2, rephrase R < S in statement 1 as S > R.
Adding together X > Y and S > R, we get:
X+S > Y+R.
SUFFICIENT.

The correct answer is C.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion