if x^2-x-6<0, what is the value of x?
1. x is an positive integer
2. -2<x<2
I found this somewhere on the web, the answer given is A but I thought it should be E, what do you think?
if x^2-x-6<0, what is the value of x?
This topic has expert replies
- logitech
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 2134
- Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 11:26 pm
- Thanked: 237 times
- Followed by:25 members
- GMAT Score:730
x^2-x-6<0 only when -2 < X < 3ch0719 wrote:if x^2-x-6<0, what is the value of x?
1. x is an positive integer
2. -2<x<2
I found this somewhere on the web, the answer given is A but I thought it should be E, what do you think?
So Statement 1 can not be sufficient. TRY 100 and you wont get a negative number
Statement 2 is a subset of -2 < X < 3 and sufficient.
So I would go with B
LGTCH
---------------------
"DON'T LET ANYONE STEAL YOUR DREAM!"
---------------------
"DON'T LET ANYONE STEAL YOUR DREAM!"
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 2467
- Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 6:14 pm
- Thanked: 331 times
- Followed by:11 members
Let me add to the confusion more
How abt C)???
x^2-x-6<0
x^2-x<6
x(x-1)<6
or
(x+2) (x-3) < 0
Stmt I
x could be 1,2. No need to analayze any further analysis multiple values x INSUFF
Stmt II
-2<x<2
x could have multiple value satisfying (x+2) (x-3) < 0
-1,0,1.... (just considering integers(not anydecimal values) wihtin this range)
Highly INSUFF
Stmt I and II together
x has to be 1
SUFF
Choose C)
How abt C)???
x^2-x-6<0
x^2-x<6
x(x-1)<6
or
(x+2) (x-3) < 0
Stmt I
x could be 1,2. No need to analayze any further analysis multiple values x INSUFF
Stmt II
-2<x<2
x could have multiple value satisfying (x+2) (x-3) < 0
-1,0,1.... (just considering integers(not anydecimal values) wihtin this range)
Highly INSUFF
Stmt I and II together
x has to be 1
SUFF
Choose C)
- logitech
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 2134
- Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 11:26 pm
- Thanked: 237 times
- Followed by:25 members
- GMAT Score:730
So Cramya you really think that -1,0 wont satisfy the equation?
For 0 it is -6 <0
For -1 it is -4 < 0
So I guess PUFF PUFF PASS
Oh by the way, what is HIGHLY INSUFF ?
For 0 it is -6 <0
For -1 it is -4 < 0
So I guess PUFF PUFF PASS
Oh by the way, what is HIGHLY INSUFF ?
LGTCH
---------------------
"DON'T LET ANYONE STEAL YOUR DREAM!"
---------------------
"DON'T LET ANYONE STEAL YOUR DREAM!"
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 2467
- Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 6:14 pm
- Thanked: 331 times
- Followed by:11 members
->Oh by the way, what is HIGHLY INSUFF
One that opens up a world of POSSIBILTIES.
Since x did not have to be an integer based on stm II imagine if we had considered all the decimal values between the given range that satisfied the conditions...
- logitech
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 2134
- Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 11:26 pm
- Thanked: 237 times
- Followed by:25 members
- GMAT Score:730
Cramya,
Did you study Math in the college ? If not, here is the Calculus 101
In fact, if you learn how to construct this tables you will really like them!
Did you study Math in the college ? If not, here is the Calculus 101
In fact, if you learn how to construct this tables you will really like them!
- Attachments
-
LGTCH
---------------------
"DON'T LET ANYONE STEAL YOUR DREAM!"
---------------------
"DON'T LET ANYONE STEAL YOUR DREAM!"
- logitech
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 2134
- Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 11:26 pm
- Thanked: 237 times
- Followed by:25 members
- GMAT Score:730
what is the value of x ?
Okay - End of misunderstanding.
Cramya, I thought that you are saying that -1 and 0 will not satisfy the equation. My bad.
And yes the answer is C because we are looking for a VALUE not a RANGE so
any numbers within the range given in B will satisfy the equation but the only POSITIVE integer is + 1, since +2 is not included.
Okay - End of misunderstanding.
Cramya, I thought that you are saying that -1 and 0 will not satisfy the equation. My bad.
And yes the answer is C because we are looking for a VALUE not a RANGE so
any numbers within the range given in B will satisfy the equation but the only POSITIVE integer is + 1, since +2 is not included.
LGTCH
---------------------
"DON'T LET ANYONE STEAL YOUR DREAM!"
---------------------
"DON'T LET ANYONE STEAL YOUR DREAM!"
thanks
given the statement 1 and 2, we can already conclude that the only possible outcome of x is 1, because x has to be a positive int and it has to be lower than a 2, then it got to be 1 regardless of what the question is asking
therefore i guess the question may be not too legit
given the statement 1 and 2, we can already conclude that the only possible outcome of x is 1, because x has to be a positive int and it has to be lower than a 2, then it got to be 1 regardless of what the question is asking
therefore i guess the question may be not too legit
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 833
- Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 1:56 am
- Thanked: 13 times
cramya,cramya wrote:
Cramya
(x+2) (x-3
vaulue of X here would be x<-2 and x<3 isnt it but acc to u ..it is
between -2 <x<3 , how cm
if u put x+2<0
u ll get x<-2
or x>-2
Pls explain
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 2467
- Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 6:14 pm
- Thanked: 331 times
- Followed by:11 members
I dont think I said -2 <x<3 in my post. I am missing something. Let em know.cramya,
vaulue of X here would be x<-2 and x<3 isnt it but acc to u ..it is
between -2 <x<3 , how cm
if u put x+2<0
u ll get x<-2
or x>-2
(x+2) (x-3) < 0 is from the whats given
I was telling -2<x<2 (stmt 2) is insuffcient since -1,0,1 all fit the bill
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 833
- Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 1:56 am
- Thanked: 13 times
sorry, it was said by Logitech but if logitech has done this, this is not correct...am i rite.
it is basic but i am not confident of my inequality skills
so,
x+2 <0
means x< -2..
am i rite...this is my ques.
it is basic but i am not confident of my inequality skills
so,
x+2 <0
means x< -2..
am i rite...this is my ques.
Hello Vivek,
It is -2<x<3 because, because when you factorize,
(x-3)(x+2)<0
so, only one of the two factors can be negative, and the other one has to positive.
hence, x-3 will be negative only when x<3, and x+2 will be negative, only when x>-2...
hence, we get
-2 < x< 3
even i think that the answer will be C,
since only A and B just narrow down this range, however both combined limit the answer to just 1.
It is -2<x<3 because, because when you factorize,
(x-3)(x+2)<0
so, only one of the two factors can be negative, and the other one has to positive.
hence, x-3 will be negative only when x<3, and x+2 will be negative, only when x>-2...
hence, we get
-2 < x< 3
even i think that the answer will be C,
since only A and B just narrow down this range, however both combined limit the answer to just 1.