BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

If x < 0, is y > 0 ?

Expert replies
by melguy » Sat Oct 29, 2016 3:51 am
Hello

Please help me with this simple yet confusing question

Statement 1

We know that x is negative so other sign has to be positive.
Sufficient

Statement 2
Please confirm if it is safe to rephrase Statement 2 as Is y > x without knowing the sign of y.

If that's the case then can conclude that y is any number greater than x and can be positive and negative.

Please correct me if I am wrong.

Thanks
Attachments
159.JPG
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Sat Oct 29, 2016 5:49 am
If x < 0, is y > 0?

(1) x/y < 0
(2) y - x > 0

Target question: Is y > 0?

Given: x < 0

Statement 1: x/y < 0
We're told that x < 0. In other words, x is NEGATIVE
So, statement 1 is really telling us that (SOME NEGATIVE #)/y = NEGATIVE
So, y must be POSITIVE
In other words, y > 0
Since we can answer the target question with certainty, statement 1 is SUFFICIENT

Statement 2: y - x > 0
Add x to both sides to get y > x
It is also given that x < 0
To try to COMBINE the inequalities, we must get the inequality symbols facing same way.
So, let's rewrite y > x as x < y
Ahhh, so we know that x < 0 and x < y
From this we cannot determine whether or not y > 0
Consider these two conflicting cases:
Case a: x = -2 and y = 1. In this case, y > 0
Case b: x = -2 and y = -1. In this case, y < 0
Since we cannot answer the target question with certainty, statement 2 is NOT SUFFICIENT

Answer = A

RELATED VIDEOS
- Inequalities - Part I: https://www.gmatprepnow.com/module/gmat ... /video/979
- Inequalities - Part II: https://www.gmatprepnow.com/module/gmat ... /video/982
Last edited by Brent@GMATPrepNow on Sat Oct 29, 2016 8:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Join the discussion

by melguy » Sat Oct 29, 2016 7:01 pm
Thanks Brent.

I had a quick question. I remember reading somewhere that in DS two statements cannot contradict each other. In our case we have Y is positive (1) and Y is negative (2).

Also in the original question we had y - x > 0. I think there was a typo and we have considered it as (2) x - y > 0.

Please confirm if I am missing something.
Last edited by melguy on Mon Oct 31, 2016 6:25 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Join the discussion

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Sat Oct 29, 2016 8:29 pm
melguy wrote:Thanks Brent.

I had a quick question. I remember reading somewhere that in DS two statements cannot contradict each other. In our case we have Y is positive (1) and Y is negative (2).

Also in the original question we had y - x > 0. I think there was a type and we have considered it as (2) x - y > 0.

Please confirm if I am missing something.

(P.S. I am learning inequalities all over again after many years so please pardon my silly questions!)
You're right; I accidentally transcribed statement 2 incorrectly. I have edited my response accordingly.,

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Join the discussion

by ceilidh.erickson » Mon Oct 31, 2016 7:27 am
Please confirm if it is safe to rephrase Statement 2 as Is y > x without knowing the sign of y.
Just to answer your question directly: yes, you can certainly rephrase (2) as y > x. It's always allowable to add or subtract a variable across an inequality sign, because adding/subtracting don't change the inequality sign. The only danger is in MULTIPLYING. Whenever we multiply or divide a negative across an inequality, the sign flips. For this reason, we should never multiply or divide a variable across an inequality unless we know the sign.

Make sure you don't mix up your addition v. multiplication rules!
Ceilidh Erickson
EdM in Mind, Brain, and Education
Harvard Graduate School of Education
Join the discussion