BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

130-point score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

If two distinct positive divisors of 64 are randomly selected, what is the probability that their sum will be less than

Expert replies
by BTGModeratorVI » Thu Jul 23, 2020 6:51 am

Timer

00:00

Answers

A

B

C

D

E

Stats

Difficulty

If two distinct positive divisors of 64 are randomly selected, what is the probability that their sum will be less than 32?

A. 1/3
B. 1/2
C. 5/7
D. 10/21
E. 15/28

Answer: D
Source: Veritas Prep
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

BTGModeratorVI wrote:
Thu Jul 23, 2020 6:51 am
If two distinct positive divisors of 64 are randomly selected, what is the probability that their sum will be less than 32?

A. 1/3
B. 1/2
C. 5/7
D. 10/21
E. 15/28

Answer: D
Source: Veritas Prep
Here are the positive divisors of 64: {1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64}

We can see that, as long as we DON'T select the 32 or 64, then the sum of the two numbers is guaranteed to be less than 32
So, P(sum is less than 32) = P(neither is a 64 nor the 32 is selected)
= P(no 64 or 32 is selected on the 1st try AND no 64 or 32 is selected on the 2nd try)
= P(no 64 or 32 is selected on the 1st try) x P(no 64 or 32 is selected on the 2nd try)
= 5/7 x 4/6
= 20/42
= 10/21

Answer: D

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Join the discussion

BTGModeratorVI wrote:
Thu Jul 23, 2020 6:51 am
If two distinct positive divisors of 64 are randomly selected, what is the probability that their sum will be less than 32?

A. 1/3
B. 1/2
C. 5/7
D. 10/21
E. 15/28

Answer: D
Source: Veritas Prep
List the distinct positive factors: \(1,2,4,8,16,32,64\)

Selecting \(2\) from this list \(= 7C2 = 21\)

As per the given condition there sum has to be less than \(32\)

Picking any \(2\) numbers from our list of first five numbers will render the sum less than \(32\) in any case

Selecting \(2\) numbers from \(5\) numbers \(= 5C2 = 10\)

Probability \(= \dfrac{10}{21}\)

Therefore, D
Join the discussion

BTGModeratorVI wrote:
Thu Jul 23, 2020 6:51 am
If two distinct positive divisors of 64 are randomly selected, what is the probability that their sum will be less than 32?

A. 1/3
B. 1/2
C. 5/7
D. 10/21
E. 15/28

Answer: D
Solution:

The positive divisors of 64 are:

1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, and 64

If the sum of two distinct divisors of 64 is less than 32, each has to be less than 32. Therefore, they are 1, 2, 4, 8, and 16. The number of ways to select 2 divisors from these 5 divisors is 5C2 = (5 x 4)/2 = 10.

Since the total number of ways to select 2 divisors from all 7 divisors is 7C2 = (7 x 6)/2 = 21, the probability is 10/21.

Answer: D

Scott Woodbury-Stewart
Founder and CEO
[email protected]

Image

See why Target Test Prep is rated 5 out of 5 stars on BEAT the GMAT. Read our reviews

ImageImage
Join the discussion