DS: Rectangle

This topic has expert replies
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 13
Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2010 10:51 pm
Thanked: 1 times

DS: Rectangle

by amitmj » Fri Apr 18, 2014 1:43 am

Timer

00:00

Your Answer

A

B

C

D

E

Global Stats

The surface area of a rectangular field was changed so that the length of one
of the dimensions was reduced by 10 feet and the length of the other dimension
was increased by 20 feet. What was the surface area before these changes
were made?
(1) After the changes were made, the surface area was 2,500 square feet.
(2) The length and width of the field were equal after the changes were made
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
Followed by:1906 members
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Fri Apr 18, 2014 3:09 am

Timer

00:00

Your Answer

A

B

C

D

E

Global Stats

amitmj wrote:The surface area of a rectangular field was changed so that the length of one
of the dimensions was reduced by 10 feet and the length of the other dimension
was increased by 20 feet. What was the surface area before these changes
were made?
(1) After the changes were made, the surface area was 2,500 square feet.
(2) The length and width of the field were equal after the changes were made
Statement 1: After the changes were made, the surface area was 2,500 square feet.
Test one case that also satisfies statement 2.
Case 1: After the changes, L=50 and W=50, so that LW = 50*50 = 2500
Since one dimension was reduced by 10 feet (from 60 to 50), while the other dimension was increased by 20 feet (from 30 to 50), the original surface area = 60*30 = 1800.

Test one case that DOESN'T also satisfy statement 2.
Case 1: After the changes, L=25 and W=100, so that LW = 25*100 = 2500
If the length was reduced by 10 feet (from 35 to 25), while the width was increased by 20 feet (from 80 to 100), the original surface area = 35*80 = 2800.

Since the original surface area can be different values, INSUFFICIENT.

Statement 2: The length and width of the field were equal after the changes were made
Case 1 also satisfies statement 2.
In this case, the original surface area = 1800.

Case 3: After the changes, L=40 and W=40
Since one dimension was reduced by 10 feet (from 50 to 40), while the other dimension was increased by 20 feet (from 20 to 40), the original surface area = 50*20 = 1000.

Since the original surface area can be different values, INSUFFICIENT.

Statements combined:
Both statements are satisfied only by Case 1, implying that the original surface area = 1800.
SUFFICIENT.

The correct answer is C.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 16207
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pm
Location: Vancouver, BC
Thanked: 5254 times
Followed by:1268 members
GMAT Score:770

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Fri Apr 18, 2014 6:38 am

Timer

00:00

Your Answer

A

B

C

D

E

Global Stats

amitmj wrote:The surface area of a rectangular field was changed so that the length of one of the dimensions was reduced by 10 feet and the length of the other dimension was increased by 20 feet. What was the surface area before these changes were made?

(1) After the changes were made, the surface area was 2,500 square feet.
(2) The length and width of the field were equal after the changes were made
Target question: What was the surface area before the changes were made?

Let L = original length of the rectangular field
Let W = original width
So, the original AREA = LW

REPHRASED target question: What is the value of LW?

Statement 1: After the changes were made, the surface area was 2,500 square feet.
After the changes, the NEW length = L - 10 and the NEW width = W + 20
So, we get (L - 10)(W + 20) = 2500
Expand to get LW + 20L - 10W - 200 = 2500
Is this enough information to determine the value of LW? No.
Since we cannot answer the REPHRASED target question with certainty, statement 1 is NOT SUFFICIENT

Statement 2: The length and width of the field were equal after the changes were made.
In other words, L - 10 = W + 20
Is this enough information to determine the value of LW? No.
Since we cannot answer the REPHRASED target question with certainty, statement 2 is NOT SUFFICIENT

Statements 1 and 2 combined
Statement 1 tells us that (L - 10)(W + 20) = 2500
Statement 2 tells us that L - 10 = W + 20
If (L - 10) and (W + 20) are EQUAL (from statement 2) and (L - 10)(W + 20) = 2500 (from statement 1), then (L - 10) and (W + 20) must both equal 50
If L - 10 = 50, then L = 60
If W + 20 = 50, then W = 30
So, LW = (60)(30) = 1800
Since we can answer the REPHRASED target question with certainty, the combined statements are SUFFICIENT

Answer = C

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 33
Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2018 2:09 am

by masoom j negi » Thu Dec 20, 2018 2:38 am

Timer

00:00

Your Answer

A

B

C

D

E

Global Stats

Statement 1. After the changes were made, the surface area was 2,500 square feet.
Statement 1 gives (l - 10)(b + 20) = 2500. Hence, Insufficient.
Statement 2. The length and width of the field were equal after the changes were made.
Statement 2 gives l - 10 = b + 20
l = b + 30. Hence, Insufficient.
Statement 1 & 2 together. ( l -10)(b + 20) = 2500 & l = b + 30.
(b + 30 - 10)(b + 20) = 2500 = (b + 20)2 .
So, b+ 20 = 50 i.e. b = 30 and l = 60. Hence, sufficient.
Hence, c is the answer.