NandishSS wrote:If m, p, s and v are positive, and m/p<s/v, which of the following must be between m/p and s/v
I. m+s/p+v
II. ms/pv
III. s/v−m/p
A. None
B. I only
C. II only
D. III only
E. I and II both
Let's analyze each statement using specific values for the variables.
We can let m = 2, s = 3, p = 4, and v = 5. Thus:
m/p = 2/4 = 0.5 and s/v = 3/5 = 0.6.
Notice that m/p = 0.5 is less than s/v = 0.6. Now let's analyze each statement.
I. (m+s)/(p+v)
(2 + 3)/(4 + 5) = 5/9 = 0.555... is between m/p = 0.5 and s/v = 0.6.
II. (ms)/(pv)
(2 x 3)/(4 x 5) = 6/20 = 0.3 is NOT between 0.5 and 0.6.
III. s/v - m/p
3/5 - 2/4 = 0.6 - 0.5 = 0.1 is NOT between 0.5 and 0.6.
From the above, we see that only statement I is true. However, this was illustrated by using one set of numbers (m = 2, s = 3, p = 4, and v = 5). It's possible that it could be false when we use another set of values for m, s, p, and m.
However, we can prove that (m+s)/(p+v) is between m/p and s/v; that is, we can prove that m/p < (m+s)/(p+v) < s/v regardless of the values we use for m, s, p, and m, as long as the values are positive.
Notice that m/p < (m+s)/(p+v) < s/v means m/p < (m+s)/(p+v) and (m+s)/(p+v) < s/v. Also, keep in mind that we are given that m/p < s/v, which is equivalent to mv < ps.
Let's prove that m/p < (m+s)/(p+v):
m/p < (m+s)/(p+v) ?
m(p+v) < p(m + s) ?
mp + mv < mp + ps?
mv < ps ? (YES)
Since mv < ps is true, m/p < (m+s)/(p+v) is true. Finally, let's prove that (m+s)/(p+v) < s/v:
(m+s)/(p+v) < s/v ?
v(m+s) < s(p+v)?
mv + sv < sp + sv ?
mv < ps ? (YES)
Again, since mv < ps is true, (m+s)/(p+v) < s/v is true. Thus we have shown that m/p < (m+s)/(p+v) < s/v is always true.
Answer:
B