BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

If k, m, and t are positive integers and

Expert replies
by mitzwillrockgmat » Mon May 24, 2010 10:35 am
If k, m, and t are positive integers and K/6 + M/4 = T/12 , do T and 12 have a common factor greater than 1 ?

(1) k is a multiple of 3.
(2) m is a multiple of 3.

A. Statement (1) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (2) alone is not sufficient.
B. Statement (2) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (1) alone is not sufficient.
C. BOTH statements TOGETHER are sufficient, but NEITHER statement ALONE is sufficient.
D. EACH statement ALONE is sufficient.
E. Statements (1) and (2) TOGETHER are NOT sufficient.

Pleaassssse help! :)
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by asamaverick » Mon May 24, 2010 11:00 am
K/6 + M/4 = T/12

Multiplying each term by 12 gives us:
(2K + 3M) = T

We have to identify if T has any one of these as its factors: 2,3,4,6, 12 (these are the factors of 12 > 1)

(1) K is a multiple of 3. Let K = 3x (x is an integer)
This means T = 2K + 3M = 6x + 3 m = 3 (2x + m) will always be a multiple of 3. Hence 3 will always be a factor of 12. Hence yes, they have a common factor greater than 1.

(2) M is a multiple of 3.
Let M = 3y (y is an integer)
T = 2K + 3(3y) = 2K + 9y.
Consider K = 1, y = 1. This gives T = 11, no common factor > 1.
Consider K = 1, y = 2. This gives T = 20, has 2 as a common factor with 12.
Hence (2) alone is insufficient.

Therefore, IMO the answer should be A. What's the OA?
Join the discussion

by Patrick_GMATFix » Mon May 24, 2010 11:03 am
The equation in the prompt can be rewritten as 2k/12 + 3m/12 = t/12. So we can deduce that 2k+3m=t

Question is: do t and 12 have common factors greater than 1? REPHRASE: Is t a multiple of 2, 3, 4, 6 or 12?

(1) Since k is a multiple of 3, 2k must also be a multiple of 3. t = 2k+3m, so we can deduce that t = (multiple of 3) + (multiple of 3). Therefore, t is a multiple of 3. This definitively answers the rephrase. (1) is sufficient.

(2) Because m is a multiple of 3, 3m must be a multiple of 9. t = 2k+3m, so we can deduce that t = 2k + (multiple of 9). If t = 11, it will have NO common factors with 12. Otherwise if t=20, then it will have several common factors with 12. We don't have enough data to answer.

Correct answer is A

TAKE-AWAY: Algebraically, the only way to prove that an expression is a multiple of x is to show that the expression can be written as the product of (x) and an integer. For instance, statement (1) allows us to replace k with 3*int and to rewrite t=2k+3m as t=2*3*int+3m ---> t = 3(2*int+m). Notice that t must be a multiple of 3 since it equals 3 times the integer (2*int+m).

You can find similar questions if you have access to the Solutions Engine by searching for questions of topic="Number Properties" and difficulty="600-700 AND 700+"

-Best of luck,
Patrick
Join the discussion

by albatross86 » Mon May 24, 2010 11:04 am
Here's my guess:

First job is reducing the question stem to something workable:

k/6 + m/4 = t/12
Multiply throughout by 12
=> t = 2k + 3m

We need to find out if t shares a factor with 12, greater than 1.

Statement 1:
k is a multiple of 3. So let's say k is 3x where x is k/3 which would be an integer.

=> t = 2*3x + 3m
=> t = 3*(2x + 3m)

Therefore 3 is a factor of t. 3 is also a factor of 12. SUFFICIENT.


Statement 2:
m is a multiple of 3.
You can see clearly that this doesn't really help us do much with the question stem to determine anything about t's factors. INSUFFICIENT.

Pick A.
Join the discussion

by mitzwillrockgmat » Tue May 25, 2010 11:26 am
albatross86 wrote:Here's my guess:

First job is reducing the question stem to something workable:

k/6 + m/4 = t/12
Multiply throughout by 12
=> t = 2k + 3m

We need to find out if t shares a factor with 12, greater than 1.

Statement 1:
k is a multiple of 3. So let's say k is 3x where x is k/3 which would be an integer.

=> t = 2*3x + 3m
=> t = 3*(2x + 3m)

Therefore 3 is a factor of t. 3 is also a factor of 12. SUFFICIENT.


Statement 2:
m is a multiple of 3.
You can see clearly that this doesn't really help us do much with the question stem to determine anything about t's factors. INSUFFICIENT.

Pick A.
thanks everyone! really good explainations! :)
Join the discussion