BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

if a + b <> 0

Expert replies
by m&m » Mon Jul 27, 2009 1:59 pm
Just wrote a practice GMAT test from Knewton. I believe the following question is wrong, could someone find a flaw in my logic... OA is E -

if a+b <> 0 is (2a-b)/(2a+b) > 1
1) a>0
2) b<0

I solved this algebraically. If we assume inequality is true then:
2a/(2a+b) - b/(2a+b) >1
2a/(2a+b)>1+b/(2a+b)
2a/(2a+b)>(2a+b+b)/(2a+b)
2a/(2a+b)>(2a+2b)/(2a+b)
2a/(2a+b)>(2a)/(2a+b)+ (2b)/(2a+b)
2a/(2a+b)-(2a)/(2a+b)> (2b)/(2a+b)
0 > (2b)/(2a+b)
0 > 2b
so b<0 must be true for inequality to be true... I picked B

Am I off here?

Thanks for your help
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by vinayakdl » Mon Jul 27, 2009 3:11 pm
I agree with E,

try (1,-1) and (1,-5) and the it is clear that a & 2 are not sufficient.

Vinayak
Join the discussion

by m&m » Tue Jul 28, 2009 8:43 am
thanks

Could someone please help me point out where I went wrong?
Join the discussion

Re: if a + b <> 0

by Ian Stewart » Tue Jul 28, 2009 9:14 am
m&m wrote:Just wrote a practice GMAT test from Knewton. I believe the following question is wrong, could someone find a flaw in my logic... OA is E -

if a+b <> 0 is (2a-b)/(2a+b) > 1
1) a>0
2) b<0

I solved this algebraically. If we assume inequality is true then:
2a/(2a+b) - b/(2a+b) >1
2a/(2a+b)>1+b/(2a+b)
2a/(2a+b)>(2a+b+b)/(2a+b)
2a/(2a+b)>(2a+2b)/(2a+b)
2a/(2a+b)>(2a)/(2a+b)+ (2b)/(2a+b)
2a/(2a+b)-(2a)/(2a+b)> (2b)/(2a+b)
0 > (2b)/(2a+b)
0 > 2b

so b<0 must be true for inequality to be true... I picked B

Am I off here?

Thanks for your help
I highlighted the mistake in red above - you appear to have multiplied on both sides by 2a + b, which you can't do, since you don't know whether 2a + b is positive or negative. If it were negative, you would need to reverse the inequality.
For online GMAT math tutoring, or to buy my higher-level Quant books and problem sets, contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com

ianstewartgmat.com
Join the discussion

Re: if a + b <> 0

by fruti_yum » Tue Sep 08, 2009 11:47 am
Ian Stewart wrote:
m&m wrote:Just wrote a practice GMAT test from Knewton. I believe the following question is wrong, could someone find a flaw in my logic... OA is E -

if a+b <> 0 is (2a-b)/(2a+b) > 1
1) a>0
2) b<0

I solved this algebraically. If we assume inequality is true then:
2a/(2a+b) - b/(2a+b) >1
2a/(2a+b)>1+b/(2a+b)
2a/(2a+b)>(2a+b+b)/(2a+b)
2a/(2a+b)>(2a+2b)/(2a+b)
2a/(2a+b)>(2a)/(2a+b)+ (2b)/(2a+b)
2a/(2a+b)-(2a)/(2a+b)> (2b)/(2a+b)
0 > (2b)/(2a+b)
0 > 2b

so b<0 must be true for inequality to be true... I picked B

Am I off here?

Thanks for your help
I highlighted the mistake in red above - you appear to have multiplied on both sides by 2a + b, which you can't do, since you don't know whether 2a + b is positive or negative. If it were negative, you would need to reverse the inequality.

IAN... the way i approached it..

I assumed 2a +b to be positive .. then I get b <0
I assumed 2a +b to be negative.. then i get b >0

when i'm given b <0 then don't i already know that 2a + b is positive??

pls let me know if i'm doing anything wrong?
Join the discussion