BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

If 60! is written out as an integer, with how many

Expert replies
by BTGmoderatorDC » Mon Nov 12, 2018 9:16 pm

Timer

00:00

Answers

A

0%

B

0%

C

0%

D

0%

E

0%

Stats

Difficulty

0% CorrectAvg —

0% IncorrectAvg —

If 60! is written out as an integer, with how many consecutive 0's will that integer end?

A. 6
B. 12
C. 14
D. 42
E. 56

OA C

Source: Manhattan Prep
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by GMATGuruNY » Tue Nov 13, 2018 3:26 am
BTGmoderatorDC wrote:If 60! is written out as an integer, with how many consecutive 0's will that integer end?

A. 6
B. 12
C. 14
D. 42
E. 56
60! = 60*59*58*....*3*2*1.

Since 10=2*5, EVERY COMBINATION OF 2*5 contained within the prime-factorization of 60! will yield a 0 at the end of the integer representation of 60!.
The prime-factorization of 60! is composed of FAR MORE 2'S than 5's.
Thus, the number of 0's depends on the NUMBER OF 5's contained within 60!.

To count the number of 5's, simply divide increasing POWERS OF 5 into 60.

Every multiple of 5 within 60! provides at least one 5:
60/5 = 12 --> twelves 5's.
Every multiple of 5² provides a SECOND 5:
60/5² = 2 --> two more 5's.
Thus, the total number of 5's contained within 60! = 12+2 = 14.

The correct answer is C.

Another example:

If 200! is written out as an integer, with how many consecutive 0's will that integer end?

Every multiple of 5 within 200! provides at least one 5:
200/5 = 40 --> forty 5's.
Every multiple of 5² provides a SECOND 5:
200/5² = 8 --> eight more 5's.
Every multiple of 5³ provides a THIRD 5:
200/5³ = 1 --> one more 5.
Thus, the total number of 5's contained within 200! = 40+8+1 = 49.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by fskilnik@GMATH » Tue Nov 13, 2018 9:52 am
The reason why "the counting of 5´s recipe" (mentioned and shown in the post above) works is explained here:

https://www.beatthegmat.com/if-n-is-the ... tml#819465

Regards,
Fabio.
Fabio Skilnik :: GMATH method creator ( Math for the GMAT)
English-speakers :: https://www.gmath.net
Portuguese-speakers :: https://www.gmath.com.br
Join the discussion

by Scott@TargetTestPrep » Sun Jan 27, 2019 6:37 pm
BTGmoderatorDC wrote:If 60! is written out as an integer, with how many consecutive 0's will that integer end?

A. 6
B. 12
C. 14
D. 42
E. 56

OA C

Source: Manhattan Prep
To determine the number of trailing zeros in a number, we need to determine the number of 5-and-2 pairs within the prime factorization of 60!. Note that each 5-and-2 pair (which is equivalent to 10) creates a trailing zero.

Since we know there are fewer 5s in 60! than 2s, we can find the number of 5s and thus be able to determine the number of 5-and-2 pairs.

To determine the number of 5s within 60!, we can use the following shortcut in which we divide 60 by 5, then divide the quotient of 60/5 by 5 and continue this process until we no longer get a nonzero quotient.

60/5 = 12

12/5 = 2 (we can ignore the remainder)

Since 2/5 does not produce a nonzero quotient, we can stop.

The final step is to add up our quotients; that sum represents the number of factors of 5 within 60!.

Thus, there are 12 + 2 = 14 factors of 5 within 60! And this means also that there are 14 5-and-2 pairs within 60!, and thus there are 14 trailing zeros.

Answer: C

Scott Woodbury-Stewart
Founder and CEO
[email protected]

Image

See why Target Test Prep is rated 5 out of 5 stars on BEAT the GMAT. Read our reviews

ImageImage
Join the discussion