BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

If -2x>3y, is x negative?

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by Zipper » Thu Dec 04, 2008 4:36 am
1. Obvious, x must be negative.

2. 2x+5y-20=0; 2x+5y=20 | :5;

2/5x+y=4; y=4-2/5x

When we supstitude y in -2x>3y we get -2x>3(4-2/5x); -2x>12-6/5x; -2x+6/5x>12; -0,8x>12 so x must be negative

hence, D
Join the discussion

by austin » Thu Dec 04, 2008 7:30 am
If -2x>3y, is x negative?

Stem translation: if x < (-3/2)y, is x <0??


(1) y>0 => x is negative....

(2) 2x+5y-20=0
2x + 5y = 20
x < -1.5 y.

put x = -2y => y = 20; x<-30=> x is negative...
you can try for different values...

D
Join the discussion

by cramya » Thu Dec 04, 2008 4:10 pm
Another way(without picking numbers)t


Question stem

-2x>3y => 0>3y+2x (i.e 3y+2x is negative)

Stmt I

y>0

Then x has to be negative so that the inequality -2x>3y holds

SUFF

Stmt II

2x+5y-20=0
2x+5y = 20

2x+3y+2y=20

Since we know 2x+3y<0 therefore 2y has to be positive since the result is 20 (positive)

So we again know y>0 therefore x<0 again

SUFF


Hope I dint mess up with stmt II anlaysis :-)

D)
Join the discussion

by lunarpower » Fri Dec 05, 2008 3:18 am
here's a more ground-level solution for statement (2).

notice that there's a '2x' in the inequality given in the question prompt, and another '2x' in statement 2. this is a fine opportunity for substitution.

so, SOLVE both things for the '2x':

divide the inequality by -1 --> 2x < -3y

isolate the '2x' in statement (2) --> 2x = -5y + 20

substitute --> -5y + 20 < -3y

solve --> 20 < 2y
10 < y
y > 10
which means
-2x > 3y > 30
-2x > 30
x < -15
sufficient

--

you can theoretically use plug-in-numbers on this problem, but it's much more trouble than is worthwhile.
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron
Join the discussion

by 4meonly » Fri Dec 05, 2008 4:05 am
Ron, thanx.
I dont like to plug numbers. This is second-best approach for me.
Join the discussion

by farooq » Thu Oct 29, 2009 5:04 am
you can theoretically use plug-in-numbers on this problem, but it's much more trouble than is worthwhile.
As you said and shown, once we simply the inequality we can plug-in-numbers comfortably.

Thanks for this valuable explanation.
Regards,
Farooq Farooqui.
London. UK

It is your Attitude, not your Aptitude, that determines your Altitude.
Join the discussion