BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

If \(2.00X\) and \(3.00Y\) are \(2\) numbers in decimal form with thousandths digits \(X\) and \(Y,\) is

Expert replies
by VJesus12 » Thu Sep 16, 2021 11:49 am

Timer

00:00

Answers

A

B

C

D

E

Stats

Difficulty

If \(2.00X\) and \(3.00Y\) are \(2\) numbers in decimal form with thousandths digits \(X\) and \(Y,\) is \(3(2.00X) > 2(3.00Y) ?\)

(1) \(3X < 2Y\)
(2) \(X < Y - 3\)

Answer: D

Source: Official Guide
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

VJesus12 wrote:
Thu Sep 16, 2021 11:49 am
If \(2.00X\) and \(3.00Y\) are \(2\) numbers in decimal form with thousandths digits \(X\) and \(Y,\) is \(3(2.00X) > 2(3.00Y) ?\)

(1) \(3X < 2Y\)
(2) \(X < Y - 3\)

Answer: D

Source: Official Guide
Given: 2.00X and 3.00Y are 2 numbers in decimal form with thousandths digits X and Y

Target question: Is 3(2.00X) > 2(3.00Y)?
This is a good candidate for rephrasing the target question.

Since X is the thousandths digit, we can write: 2.00X = 2 + X/1000
Since Y is the thousandths digit, we can write: 3.00Y = 3 + Y/1000

So, the target question becomes: Is 3(2 + X/1000) > 2(3 + Y/1000)?
Expand both sides: Is 6 + 3X/1000 > 6 + 2Y/1000)?
Subtract 6 from both sides: Is 3X/1000 > 2Y/1000)?
Multiply both sides by 1000 to get: Is 3X > 2Y ?
REPHRASED target question: Is 3X > 2Y?

Aside: the video below has tips on rephrasing the target question

Statement 1:3X < 2Y
PERFECT!!
The answer to the REPHRASED target question is NO, 3X is NOT greater than 2Y
Since we can answer the REPHRASED target question with certainty, statement 1 is SUFFICIENT

Statement 2: X < Y − 3
Add 3 to both sides to get: X + 3 < Y
This one is TRICKY!!
The solution relies on the fact that X and Y are DIGITS (0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 or 9)
Let's examine all possible DIGIT solutions to the inequality X + 3 < Y
case a: X = 0, and Y = 4,5,6,7,8 or 9. In all possible cases, 3X < 2Y
case b: X = 1, and Y = 5,6,7,8 or 9. In all possible cases, 3X < 2Y
case c: X = 2, and Y = 6,7,8 or 9. In all possible cases, 3X < 2Y
case d: X = 3, and Y = 7,8 or 9. In all possible cases, 3X < 2Y
case e: X = 4, and Y = 8 or 9. In all possible cases, 3X < 2Y
case f: X = 5, and Y = 9. In all possible cases, 3X < 2Y

Now that we've examine all possible values of X and Y, we can see that the answer to the REPHRASED target question is always the same: NO, 3X is NOT greater than 2Y
Since we can answer the REPHRASED target question with certainty, statement 2 is SUFFICIENT

Answer: D

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Join the discussion