BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

if 0<x<y, what is (x+y)^2/(x-y)^2?

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by [email protected] » Sun Apr 10, 2016 9:03 am
Hi ceh232,

This question is based around a couple of Algebra patterns: Classic Quadratics.

We're told that 0 < X < Y, which means that we're dealing with positive numbers only. We're asked for the value of (X+Y)^2 / (X-Y)^2.

To start, we can rewrite the given question:

[X^2 + 2XY + Y^2] / [X^2 - 2XY + Y^2] = ?

By looking at the question in this way, we might find it easier to answer...

1) X^2 + Y^2 = 3XY

With this Fact, we can substitute in 3XY for "X^2 + Y^2" in the question...

[3XY + 2XY] / [3XY - 2XY]

Then we can combine "like terms" and simplify:

[5XY] / [XY] = 5/1 = 5. We now have the answer to the given question (and it's the ONLY answer).
Fact 1 is SUFFICIENT

2) XY = 3

With this fact, we can also substitute in a value, but we still don't know what X^2 or Y^2 actually equals. We end up with...

[X^2 + 2(3) + Y^2] / [X^2 - 2(3) + Y^2] = ?

Without those values, the answer to the question changes (TESTing X=1, Y=3 and X=1.5, Y=2 will give you two different results).
Fact 2 is INSUFFICIENT

Final Answer: A

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
Contact Rich at [email protected]
Image
Join the discussion

by OptimusPrep » Thu Apr 14, 2016 7:45 pm
ceh232 wrote:if 0<x<y, what is value of (x+y)^2/(x-y)^2?

1) x^2 + y^2 = 3xy
2) xy = 3

Can somebody explain the correct answer for this question?
(a) statement 1 is sufficient
Given: 0<x<y
Required: (x+y)^2/(x-y)^2 = ?
Or (x^2 + y^2 +2xy)/(x^2 + y^2 - 2xy) = ? - (i)

Statement 1: x^2 + y^2 = 3xy
On substituting the values in (i)
(3xy + 2xy) / (3xy - 2xy) = 5xy / xy = 5
Sufficient

Statement 2:
xy = 3
On substituting the values in (i)
(x^2 + y^2 +6)/(x^2 + y^2 - 6)
This cannot be solved ahead.
Insufficient.

Correct Option: A
Does this help?
Join the discussion

by Matt@VeritasPrep » Fri Apr 15, 2016 1:29 pm
S1::
(x + y)² / (x - y)² =>

(x² + 2xy + y²) / (x² - 2xy + y²)

We know x² + y² = 3xy, so we can sub that in

(3xy + 2xy) / (3xy - 2xy) =>

5xy/1xy =>

5

So we've got that value after all!
Join the discussion