BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

If 0 < x < 7 and y < 9, then the lowest possible va

Expert replies
by nsuen » Thu Apr 28, 2016 3:27 am
Hi all,

I don't understand a specific explanation to this question. Thank you for your help in advance.

Q: If 0 < x < 7 and y < 9, then the lowest possible value for xy is
A. between 60 and 70
B. between 0 and 60
c. 0
d.between 0 and -70
e. less than -70

I understand why the answer is E, but I dont understand why the explanation said: since the lowest value of x is 0, the lowest possible value of xy is also 0. I thought the lowest value of X is 1 as the sign is not equal or greater but just greater.


FYI: This is the whole explanation:" It is helpful to consider extreme values when solving inequality problems, especially when given multiple inequalities. For example, the greatest xy is the product of the highest possible value of x and the highest possible value of y. Since the greatest value of x is less than 7 and the greatest possible value of y is 9, the greatest possible product would be less than 63.
In this situation, we are searching for the lowest possible value of xy. Do not make the mistake of assuming that, since the lowest value of x is 0, the lowest possible value of xy is also 0. Because there is no lower limit to the value of y, there is no lower limit to the value of xy. For example, x could be 2 and y could be -100, and xy could therefore be -200.Alternatively, note that x is a positive number while y could be infinitely negative. Since the product of a positive number and a negative number is negative, xy could be infinitely negative.The correct answer is E.
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by MartyMurray » Thu Apr 28, 2016 3:40 am
That explanation is a little sloppy. As you indicated, x cannot be 0 as the question says that x > 0.

However, the lowest value of x is not 1 as the question does not say that x must be an integer. So x can be any number that is greater than 0, including fractional numbers between 0 and 1.

Meanwhile, even though x cannot equal 0, since x can be a fractional number infinitesimally greater than 0, in testing extremes you may want to test 0, maybe not for this question, but in handling questions that use similar boundaries in different ways.

Notice that while in this question x and y cannot actually be equal to 7 and 9 respectively, testing using those upper limits would make sense were the question asking for the greatest possible value of xy. Even though that value cannot be 63, it can be a number just less than 63.
Marty Murray
Perfect Scoring Tutor With Over a Decade of Experience
MartyMurrayCoaching.com
Contact me at [email protected] for a free consultation.
Join the discussion

by [email protected] » Thu Apr 28, 2016 9:41 am
Hi nsuen,

There are a couple of possible reasons for why the explanation is a bit 'off':

1) The original question changed at some point (there might have been less-than-or-equal symbols involved at one point, or there might be typo in the prompt).
2) The author wasn't paying particularly close attention when he/she wrote the explanation.

Either of those possibilities notwithstanding, the correct answer is still correct. What is the source of this question? Are there other prompts with similar errors? If you're working with material that's consistently 'sloppy' in its design or doesn't quite match up with Official GMAT material, then you might want to invest in some new resources.

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
Contact Rich at [email protected]
Image
Join the discussion

by Matt@VeritasPrep » Thu Apr 28, 2016 2:22 pm
Well, the explanation says
Do not make the mistake of assuming that, since the lowest value of x is 0, the lowest possible value of xy is also 0.
So it isn't saying that the minimum is 0, it's saying NOT to make that mistake. A lot of people assume that y < 9 means that 0 < y < 9, but it doesn't: if we only know y < 9, y could be -1, -2, -3, ..., whatever.
Join the discussion

by nsuen » Fri Apr 29, 2016 5:19 am
Thank you guys! The question is from CAT 1 in Manhattan Prep.
Join the discussion

by Matt@VeritasPrep » Fri Apr 29, 2016 2:12 pm
nsuen wrote:Thank you guys! The question is from CAT 1 in Manhattan Prep.
It's definitely a good one to discuss, I'm glad you brought it up. Assuming y < 9 means 0 < y < 9 is very common and an easy mistake to make ... which is why the GMAT likes to test it so much!
Join the discussion