BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Identify Conclusion : Question from Manhattan Ch 2-Q5-Pg38

Expert replies
by skhanna » Thu Feb 24, 2011 3:03 am
In Chapter 2 - "Diagramming Problem Set" of Manhattan guide to Critical Reasoning 4th edition, there is the following question:

"Estimated mileage for a new vehicle assumes that the operator will never exceed sixty miles per hour, encounter traffic, or operate the air conditioner. Because these things do happen in practice, the actual mileage of the vehicle is often significantly lowerthan the estimates noted on the vehicle's window sticker. To rectify this discrepancy, the Environmental Protection Agency has mandated that by 2008, window stickers must reflect actual, rather than theoretical, mileage, a change that is expected to result in an average decline of twelve percent for city driving and eight percent for highway driving."

Manhattan answer to this question claims that there is no conclusion in this argument, but on the other hand in the chapter they mentioned that "expected to result in" is a prediction for future and hence a conclusion.

So my question is - isn't "a change that is expected to result in an average decline of twelve percent for city driving and eight percent for highway driving" a conclusion in the above argument??
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by manpsingh87 » Thu Feb 24, 2011 3:41 am
skhanna wrote:In Chapter 2 - "Diagramming Problem Set" of Manhattan guide to Critical Reasoning 4th edition, there is the following question:

"Estimated mileage for a new vehicle assumes that the operator will never exceed sixty miles per hour, encounter traffic, or operate the air conditioner. Because these things do happen in practice, the actual mileage of the vehicle is often significantly lowerthan the estimates noted on the vehicle's window sticker. To rectify this discrepancy, the Environmental Protection Agency has mandated that by 2008, window stickers must reflect actual, rather than theoretical, mileage, a change that is expected to result in an average decline of twelve percent for city driving and eight percent for highway driving."

Manhattan answer to this question claims that there is no conclusion in this argument, but on the other hand in the chapter they mentioned that "expected to result in" is a prediction for future and hence a conclusion.

So my question is - isn't "a change that is expected to result in an average decline of twelve percent for city driving and eight percent for highway driving" a conclusion in the above argument??

An argument consist of Conclusion + Premise, Conclusion is something that is drawn on the basis of the stated facts, To answer your question can you provide me the premise that makes you think that it is a conclusion.!!!
O Excellence... my search for you is on... you can be far.. but not beyond my reach!
Join the discussion

by aspirant2011 » Thu Feb 24, 2011 4:53 am
according to me it should be the conclusion only.............can someone elaborate on the same please................
Join the discussion

by Someone.on.task » Thu Feb 24, 2011 6:56 am
skhanna wrote:In Chapter 2 - "Diagramming Problem Set" of Manhattan guide to Critical Reasoning 4th edition, there is the following question:

"Estimated mileage for a new vehicle assumes that the operator will never exceed sixty miles per hour, encounter traffic, or operate the air conditioner. Because these things do happen in practice, the actual mileage of the vehicle is often significantly lowerthan the estimates noted on the vehicle's window sticker. To rectify this discrepancy, the Environmental Protection Agency has mandated that by 2008, window stickers must reflect actual, rather than theoretical, mileage, a change that is expected to result in an average decline of twelve percent for city driving and eight percent for highway driving."

Manhattan answer to this question claims that there is no conclusion in this argument, but on the other hand in the chapter they mentioned that "expected to result in" is a prediction for future and hence a conclusion.

So my question is - isn't "a change that is expected to result in an average decline of twelve percent for city driving and eight percent for highway driving" a conclusion in the above argument??

Hi, I feel these are just bunch of facts. The use of words "result-in" doesnt make "to result in an average decline of twelve percent for city driving and eight percent for highway driving" as the conclusion of the stimulus. In overall context these are the series of facts. Nothing has been derived from them.

Premise/Facts.
1) An estimated theoretical mileage is calculated based on assumptions (speed <60miles/hr etc..)
2) Under practical conditions actual mileage< estimated theoretical mileage
3) To rectify - EPA has mandated to mention on stickers the practical Mileage (which is 12% less for the City driving & 8% less for the Highway driving) rather than theoretical mileage.
Join the discussion