I HATE PRINCETON REVIEW

This topic has expert replies
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 566
Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2008 11:01 am
Location: Philadelphia
Thanked: 31 times
GMAT Score:640

by AleksandrM » Thu Mar 27, 2008 9:05 am
My review was about the practice tests ONLY. As far as the book goes, I agree with what most have already said, namely, that PR is a pretty good introductory text.

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 6
Joined: Wed Mar 19, 2008 7:47 am

by luckybrandy » Thu Mar 27, 2008 12:45 pm
thanks you for the clarification.

i'm actually purchasing the book without the DVD, so that feedback really helps and saves me 10 bucks.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 231
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2008 9:39 am
Thanked: 4 times
Followed by:1 members

I agree with you

by khurram » Mon Apr 21, 2008 6:22 am
I just took 3 PR tests 2008 also, and I was really upset at the results also.
Does not make sense.

Do you take Kaplan and MGMAT and see a score diff.
Thanks
Khurram


I had just done three mgmat tests and scored in the range 620-680 but verbal was 88% consistent in all of them. Quant was the reason my scores changed so much.

PR- I scored 590, 590, 570.
v31, m 40...v40,v30,,v31,m40.
I think the alogorithm for scoring the tests is god knows what.

I plan to now do all three OG books, and then do the 6 kaplan tests, 2 power preps, 2 gmat prep tests and leave the rest to god.
My Gmat date is june 19. so if I can finish the above by end of May, June I can revise all my notes, practice awa and revise again and again.