-
wesleywillis
- Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 8:28 am
- GMAT Score:740
Recap of test scores...
11/7 - Manhattan - 710 - q47 v40
11/12 - Manhattan - 650 - q44 v35
11/15 - Manhattan - 700 - q47 v39
11/18 - GMATPrep1 - 780 - q50 v48
11/24 - Manhattan - 770 - q50 v44
11/25 - GMATPrep2 - 770 - q49 v??
(I reset GMATPrep a couple of times, but I didn't write down the scores. All were between 750 and 780 (inclusive. haha))
12/3 - Actual - 740 - q49 v42
Resources
OG12
Manhattan SC - very good
Manhattan Number Properties
Powerscore CR Bible - (well, a cursory glance at the first few chapters)
Breakdown
Began studying the 6th of November. I was initially pleased with the first CAT test from Manhattan, since my goal was a 720. I'm not sure what the hell happened on the 2nd test, but it definitely did frustrate me a bit. In the first Manhattan test, I had to pause the test during the quant section. I felt pretty confident in RC and CR, so I didn't really study them, outside of a few chapters of Powerscore CR Bible.
Actual Test
Everything went smoothly. The proctor was very nice. I was a little concerned about the AWA's because I write pretty slow, but they turned out to be decent.
Quant
The main thing worrying me was that I would not be able to finish the quant section. On the first GMATPrep test I took, I barely finished the quant section. So, I was very concerned. Started off going a little slow in the first few questions. I sped it up in the middle, but ended up with plenty of time to finish. As far as the difficulty, I thought the quant section was closer to Manhattan GMAT than GMATPrep. Although, I may have rushed myself in the middle, thus I may have not approached the problems correctly. When I did slow down with about 15 questions left, I definitely felt that the questions were more simple. So, perhaps the questions in the middle just seemed harder than they were.
Verbal
Ah, good ole verbal. I went in usually finishing with 15-20 minutes left to spare on the section. I felt CR and RC were strong points, and SC would be the deciding factor in my score. However, it was the total opposite. The CR and RC were, in my opinion, not close to what was on the GMATPrep. They seemed to be not as clear-cut as the GMATPrep. A couple of CR questions I probably spent 5-6 minutes on. The SC problems were incredibly easy (at least I think, perhaps not). I did feel pretty dumb for not studying for the CR section, but oh well.
Final thoughts
I thought the Manhattan SC was very thorough. In retrospect, I wish I had planned for more time to study for the test, but I am thankful that I am done with it. I would just like to thank Eric and all of those at beatthegmat. Y'all are awesome. (Yes, I am from the South.)
11/7 - Manhattan - 710 - q47 v40
11/12 - Manhattan - 650 - q44 v35
11/15 - Manhattan - 700 - q47 v39
11/18 - GMATPrep1 - 780 - q50 v48
11/24 - Manhattan - 770 - q50 v44
11/25 - GMATPrep2 - 770 - q49 v??
(I reset GMATPrep a couple of times, but I didn't write down the scores. All were between 750 and 780 (inclusive. haha))
12/3 - Actual - 740 - q49 v42
Resources
OG12
Manhattan SC - very good
Manhattan Number Properties
Powerscore CR Bible - (well, a cursory glance at the first few chapters)
Breakdown
Began studying the 6th of November. I was initially pleased with the first CAT test from Manhattan, since my goal was a 720. I'm not sure what the hell happened on the 2nd test, but it definitely did frustrate me a bit. In the first Manhattan test, I had to pause the test during the quant section. I felt pretty confident in RC and CR, so I didn't really study them, outside of a few chapters of Powerscore CR Bible.
Actual Test
Everything went smoothly. The proctor was very nice. I was a little concerned about the AWA's because I write pretty slow, but they turned out to be decent.
Quant
The main thing worrying me was that I would not be able to finish the quant section. On the first GMATPrep test I took, I barely finished the quant section. So, I was very concerned. Started off going a little slow in the first few questions. I sped it up in the middle, but ended up with plenty of time to finish. As far as the difficulty, I thought the quant section was closer to Manhattan GMAT than GMATPrep. Although, I may have rushed myself in the middle, thus I may have not approached the problems correctly. When I did slow down with about 15 questions left, I definitely felt that the questions were more simple. So, perhaps the questions in the middle just seemed harder than they were.
Verbal
Ah, good ole verbal. I went in usually finishing with 15-20 minutes left to spare on the section. I felt CR and RC were strong points, and SC would be the deciding factor in my score. However, it was the total opposite. The CR and RC were, in my opinion, not close to what was on the GMATPrep. They seemed to be not as clear-cut as the GMATPrep. A couple of CR questions I probably spent 5-6 minutes on. The SC problems were incredibly easy (at least I think, perhaps not). I did feel pretty dumb for not studying for the CR section, but oh well.
Final thoughts
I thought the Manhattan SC was very thorough. In retrospect, I wish I had planned for more time to study for the test, but I am thankful that I am done with it. I would just like to thank Eric and all of those at beatthegmat. Y'all are awesome. (Yes, I am from the South.)
