BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

740 (97th percentile) - q49 v42

Find out how Beat The GMAT members tackled GMAT test prep with positive results. Get tips on GMAT test prep materials, online courses, study tips, and more.
Expert replies
by wesleywillis » Thu Dec 03, 2009 5:24 pm
Recap of test scores...

11/7 - Manhattan - 710 - q47 v40
11/12 - Manhattan - 650 - q44 v35
11/15 - Manhattan - 700 - q47 v39
11/18 - GMATPrep1 - 780 - q50 v48
11/24 - Manhattan - 770 - q50 v44
11/25 - GMATPrep2 - 770 - q49 v??
(I reset GMATPrep a couple of times, but I didn't write down the scores. All were between 750 and 780 (inclusive. haha))
12/3 - Actual - 740 - q49 v42

Resources

OG12
Manhattan SC - very good
Manhattan Number Properties
Powerscore CR Bible - (well, a cursory glance at the first few chapters)

Breakdown

Began studying the 6th of November. I was initially pleased with the first CAT test from Manhattan, since my goal was a 720. I'm not sure what the hell happened on the 2nd test, but it definitely did frustrate me a bit. In the first Manhattan test, I had to pause the test during the quant section. I felt pretty confident in RC and CR, so I didn't really study them, outside of a few chapters of Powerscore CR Bible.

Actual Test

Everything went smoothly. The proctor was very nice. I was a little concerned about the AWA's because I write pretty slow, but they turned out to be decent.

Quant

The main thing worrying me was that I would not be able to finish the quant section. On the first GMATPrep test I took, I barely finished the quant section. So, I was very concerned. Started off going a little slow in the first few questions. I sped it up in the middle, but ended up with plenty of time to finish. As far as the difficulty, I thought the quant section was closer to Manhattan GMAT than GMATPrep. Although, I may have rushed myself in the middle, thus I may have not approached the problems correctly. When I did slow down with about 15 questions left, I definitely felt that the questions were more simple. So, perhaps the questions in the middle just seemed harder than they were.

Verbal

Ah, good ole verbal. I went in usually finishing with 15-20 minutes left to spare on the section. I felt CR and RC were strong points, and SC would be the deciding factor in my score. However, it was the total opposite. The CR and RC were, in my opinion, not close to what was on the GMATPrep. They seemed to be not as clear-cut as the GMATPrep. A couple of CR questions I probably spent 5-6 minutes on. The SC problems were incredibly easy (at least I think, perhaps not). I did feel pretty dumb for not studying for the CR section, but oh well.

Final thoughts

I thought the Manhattan SC was very thorough. In retrospect, I wish I had planned for more time to study for the test, but I am thankful that I am done with it. I would just like to thank Eric and all of those at beatthegmat. Y'all are awesome. (Yes, I am from the South.)
Join the discussion
Source: — I just Beat The GMAT! |

by jaskaran » Fri Dec 04, 2009 4:18 am
Hey there, congrats on your good score, with barely one month of preparation, I wanted to ask you, the Quant questions in the actual gmat, are they similar to the one's in the OG in terms of complexity, cause I have worked out the first 120 PS form OG, and they dont seem that tough, on the other hand the sums from Kaplan are a shade tougher.

Please share you experience in terms of complexity of the questions in comparison with the OG and other material.

TIA

PS- I am a HUGE Arsenal fan too!
Join the discussion

by wesleywillis » Fri Dec 04, 2009 7:59 am
jaskaran wrote:Hey there, congrats on your good score, with barely one month of preparation, I wanted to ask you, the Quant questions in the actual gmat, are they similar to the one's in the OG in terms of complexity, cause I have worked out the first 120 PS form OG, and they dont seem that tough, on the other hand the sums from Kaplan are a shade tougher.

Please share you experience in terms of complexity of the questions in comparison with the OG and other material.

TIA

PS- I am a HUGE Arsenal fan too!
How did you like that game versus Chelsea? We really need Van Persie back. It'll be interesting to see what attacking threat Wegner can get during the upcoming transfer period.

As far as the quant section in the actual GMAT, I think it is tough to gauge the complexity without being able to see which questions I got wrong. Some questions may have only appeared difficult. I would say some of the questions on the test were closer to the difficulty on Manhattan's quant, but some were on the level of the later questions on the OG.

I do think that probability questions on the GMAT do not resemble what some test prep companies have. The probability questions on the actual GMAT were pretty simple. I didn't use Kaplan, so I can't really compare the actual vs Kaplan, but I'm sure there are some here who can.

So, that is my opinion. Personally, I would take most people's assessment of difficulty with a grain of salt. For example, I thought GMATPrep2 had more difficult quant than GMATPrep1, but after going over answers my opinion was that they were equal.

I would say that fear is the biggest enemy of test takers, and the GMAT makers take advantage of that fear. Just like magicians, GMAT makers use sleight-of-hand techniques. So, the two best things you can do for the Quant section are...

1. Don't fear the test, but don't underestimate the test.
2. Become proficient at identifying the correct approach in problems. So, compare your approach to questions you got wrong with how Kaplan/OG/whoever set up the problem.
Join the discussion