BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

I can't solve it, DS problem source from innstitute

Expert replies
by Castor.kim » Mon Oct 08, 2012 8:10 pm
Hi Dears

It looks simple, but I have no way out.
please help using your brilliant brain. :)

If xy<3, is x<1 ?
(1) y>3
(2) x<3

a.Statement(1) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (2) alone is not sufficient.
b.Statement(2) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (1) alone is not sufficient.
c.BOTH statements TOGETHER are sufficient, but NEITHER statement ALONE is sufficient.
d.EACH statement ALONE is sufficient.
e.Statements (1) and (2) TOGETHER are NOT sufficient.

OA is A

what's the way to solve this problem?
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by Whitney Garner » Mon Oct 08, 2012 8:42 pm
Castor.kim wrote:Hi Dears

It looks simple, but I have no way out.
please help using your brilliant brain. :)

If xy<3, is x<1 ?
(1) y>3
(2) x<3

a.Statement(1) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (2) alone is not sufficient.
b.Statement(2) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (1) alone is not sufficient.
c.BOTH statements TOGETHER are sufficient, but NEITHER statement ALONE is sufficient.
d.EACH statement ALONE is sufficient.
e.Statements (1) and (2) TOGETHER are NOT sufficient.

OA is A

what's the way to solve this problem?
Hi Castor.kim!

You can definitely go the picking number route, BUT I always like to start Systems of Inequalities problems by trying the "Elimination" method (this is the same as Stack-and-Add for systems of equations). The only rule is that the little inequality symbol has to line up and face the same direction.

Statement(1): "y>3"
Ok, this is how you can stack this with the info from the stem...
Image

Now we can subtract a 3 from both sides
xy < y

And since we know that y>3 and therefore positive, we can divide by y without worry:
x < 1

So Statement (1) says that x<1, this is [spoiler]SUFFICIENT![/spoiler]

Statement(2): "x<3"
Do the same thing...
Image

Now, FIGHT the temptation to subtract this second equation. What are we actually doing when we subtract an equation? We're multiplying it by -1 and adding. And what happens when we multiply by -1 in an inequality - you guessed it, our symbol changes direction and then they aren't lined up anymore!

So we get this ugly mess that at best we can factor an x out of x(y+1) < 6 or x<6/(y+1) but who knows what that means. Can I pick a couple of numbers and test quickly for Not Sufficient.

Sure,
x=2, y=1 (x is NOT less than 1)
x=0, y=anything (x is less than 1)
[spoiler]
NOT Sufficient![/spoiler]

Hope this helps!
:)
Whit
Whitney Garner
GMAT/GRE/EA Instructor & Anxiety/Accommodations Coach
www.whitneygarner.com

Contributor to Beat The GMAT!

Math is a lot like love - a simple idea that can easily get complicated :heart-eyes:
Join the discussion

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Mon Oct 08, 2012 9:11 pm
Castor.kim wrote: If xy<3, is x<1 ?
(1) y>3
(2) x<3
Target question: Is x<1 ?

Statement 1: y > 3
Since we're already told that xy < 3, and since both inequalities have a 3 in them, we can now write the following 3-part inequality: xy < 3 < y
Since we now know that y is positive, we can divide all 3 parts by y to get: x < 3/y < 1
From here, we can see that it must be the case that x < 1
As such, statement 1 is SUFFICIENT


Statement 2: x < 3
This tells us that x < 3, but it doesn't help us determine whether or not x < 1
If x < 3 and xy < 3, there are several possible cases that satisfy these conditions. Here are two such cases:
case a: x=2, y=1, in which case x is not less than 1.
case b: x=0, y=1, in which case x is not less than 1.

Since we cannot answer the target question with certainty, statement 2 is NOT SUFFICIENT

Answer = A

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Join the discussion