BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Help with this reasoning

Expert replies
by capnx » Mon Oct 26, 2009 3:26 pm
Advertisement:
The world's best coffee beans come from Colombia.
The more Colombian beans in a blend of coffee, the
better the blend, and no company purchases more
Colombian beans than Kreemo Coffee, Inc. So it only
stands to reason that if you buy a can of Kreemo's
coffee, you're buying the best blended coffee available today.

The reasoning of the argument in the advertisement is
flawed because it overlooks the possibility that

(A) the equipment used by Kreemo to blend and
package its coffee is no different from that used
by most other coffee producers

(B) not all of Kreemo's competitors use Colombian
coffee beans in the blends of coffee they sell

(C) Kreemo sells more coffee than does any other company

(D) Kreemo's coffee is the most expensive blended
coffee available today

(E) the best unblended coffee is better than the best
blended coffee

[spoiler]OA is C, but why? I chose E[/spoiler]

Question is from GMAT disclosed test No31
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by pandeyvineet24 » Mon Oct 26, 2009 4:24 pm
hi capnx,

i think E is out of scope because the argument only talks about the best blended coffee. Unblended coffee is out of scope.

C is the flaw, coz, the fact that Kreemo sells more coffee than any other company is probably the reason, it purchases more coffee than any others.
Join the discussion

by capnx » Mon Oct 26, 2009 6:21 pm
pandeyvineet24 wrote:hi capnx,

i think E is out of scope because the argument only talks about the best blended coffee. Unblended coffee is out of scope.

C is the flaw, coz, the fact that Kreemo sells more coffee than any other company is probably the reason, it purchases more coffee than any others.
oh I see. the claim is it purchases more coffee than any other stores. gotcha. thanks
Join the discussion

tough

by kiennguyen » Tue Oct 27, 2009 8:02 pm
pandeyvineet24!

this is a good question but i have a hard time to understand. can you please explain it more clearly to me?!!?
Join the discussion

Re: tough

by pandeyvineet24 » Tue Oct 27, 2009 8:22 pm
kiennguyen wrote:pandeyvineet24!

this is a good question but i have a hard time to understand. can you please explain it more clearly to me?!!?
hi kiennguyen
break the argument to see the conclusion and the supporting premises.

conclusion of the argument:
if you buy a can of Kreemo's coffee, you're buying the best blended coffee available today

Premises
(1) The world's best coffee beans come from Colombia.

(2) The more Colombian beans in a blend of coffee, the
better the blend

(3) no company purchases more Colombian beans than Kreemo Coffee, Inc.

therefore the argument has an inherent assumption that because kreemo purchases more coffee than any other company, the cans it makes have a higher blend of Columbian beens.
However,if Kreemo sells more coffee than any other company, then it manufacturers more coffee than any other company. Hence the extra Columbian beens don't increase the blend of individual cans of Coffee, but they increase the Number of Cans, which is what is stated in C.
i hope i made myself clear.
Join the discussion

got it!

by kiennguyen » Tue Oct 27, 2009 11:09 pm
appreciate your kindness! i got it now!

it is very true that if "Kreemo sells more coffee than does any other company", the proportion of Columbia coffee in a single can which it sells may not be higher than that of other companies.
Join the discussion

by dare2dream » Wed Oct 28, 2009 10:16 pm
IMO C.
Join the discussion

by gmatmachoman » Sat Nov 07, 2009 3:59 am
Guys, can someone post a detailed explanation stating why C is the best option.
Join the discussion

by Testluv » Sat Nov 07, 2009 5:47 pm
gmatmachoman wrote:Guys, can someone post a detailed explanation stating why C is the best option.
But gmatmachoman, vineet and kiennguyen's interchange was excellent.

Let me know if there is something specific bothering you here.
Kaplan Teacher in Toronto
Join the discussion

by james33 » Sun May 15, 2016 10:17 pm
Looking at it now, C makes sense
Join the discussion