Hypotheses Vs Observation ( LSAT)

This topic has expert replies
Legendary Member
Posts: 869
Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2009 3:49 pm
Location: California
Thanked: 13 times
Followed by:3 members

Hypotheses Vs Observation ( LSAT)

by heshamelaziry » Wed Sep 02, 2009 1:39 am
18. Modern science is built on the process of posing
hypotheses and testing them against observations-in
essence, attempting to show that the hypotheses are
incorrect. Nothing brings more recognition than
overthrowing conventional wisdom. It is accordingly
unsurprising that some scientists are skeptical of the
widely accepted predictions of global warming. What is
instead remarkable is that with hundreds of researchers
striving to make breakthroughs in climatology, very
few find evidence that global warming is unlikely.

The information above provides the most support for
which one of the following statements?

(A) Most scientists who are reluctant to accept the
global warming hypothesis are not acting in
accordance with the accepted standards of
scientific debate.
(B) Most researchers in climatology have substantial
motive to find evidence that would discredit
the global warming hypothesis.
(C) There is evidence that conclusively shows that
the global warming hypothesis is true.
(D) Scientists who are skeptical about global
warming have not offered any alternative
hypotheses to explain climatological data.
(E) Research in global warming is primarily driven
by a desire for recognition in the scientific
community.
Last edited by heshamelaziry on Fri Sep 04, 2009 5:47 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Legendary Member
Posts: 869
Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2009 3:49 pm
Location: California
Thanked: 13 times
Followed by:3 members

by heshamelaziry » Wed Sep 02, 2009 1:45 am
Here: Scientist doubt that global warming exist because they see it as a phenomena that is not proved by observation.

On the other hand, climitoligists are not quick to say that global warming is unlikely "discredited".


Did I get this correctly ?