BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

[CR][Percentages] HSPA posts

Expert replies
by HSPA » Wed Jul 13, 2011 6:50 am
In 2003, the Making Hits Record Company spent 40% of its total budget on the production of ten albums, 30% of its budget on the marketing of these albums, and the remainder of its budget on overhead costs. In the same year,the Song Factory Record Company spent 20% of its total budget on the production of 10 albums and 60% of itsbudget on the marketing of these albums. Making Hits sold a total of 800,000 copies of the ten records it producedin 2003, while the Song Factory sold a total of 1,600,000 copies of the ten records it produced in 2003.

Assuming each company met its budget, which of the following conclusions is best supported by the information given above?

"¢The amount of money spent on marketing is directly related to the number of copies sold.
"¢Making Hits spent more money on the production of its albums in 2003 than did the Song Factory.
"¢Song Factory's total revenue from the sale of albums produced in 2003 was higher than that of Making Hits.
"¢In 2003, Making Hits spent a larger percentage of its budget on overhead costs than did the Song Factory.
"¢The Song Factory sold more copies of its 2003 albums than Making Hits did because the Song Factory spent ahigher percentage of its budget on the marketing of its albums
First take: 640 (50M, 27V) - RC needs 300% improvement
Second take: coming soon..
Regards,
HSPA.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by Frankenstein » Wed Jul 13, 2011 7:05 am
Hi,
Making Hits Record Company spent 30% of its budget on overhead costs.
Song Factory Record Company has only 20% of its budget left for its overhead costs and any other expenses. So,percentage of its budget spent on overhead costs can be at most 20%.

Hence, D
Cheers!

Things are not what they appear to be... nor are they otherwise
Join the discussion

by Ozlemg » Wed Jul 13, 2011 12:16 pm
very tricky answer choices.
for me, D sounds ok.
Others are not properly backed up by the argument...
The more you suffer before the test, the less you will do so in the test! :)
Join the discussion

by sanabk » Wed Jul 13, 2011 12:40 pm
Argument didn't mention about the overhead costs of SFRC. So, remaining 20% accounts for overhead costs?
Confused :(
Join the discussion

by bradenm2 » Thu Jul 14, 2011 11:23 am
sanabk wrote:Argument didn't mention about the overhead costs of SFRC. So, remaining 20% accounts for overhead costs?
Confused :(
Well it doesn't really matter what the breakdown of the extra costs were for SFRC. We already know that MHRC spent 30% of its budget on overhead costs. It's impossible for SFRC to exceed this proportion since 80% of their budget is already accounted for.
Join the discussion

by sanabk » Thu Jul 14, 2011 2:35 pm
Thanks Bradenm2!!!
Join the discussion