[CR][author's puncuation] HSPA posts

This topic has expert replies
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1101
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 7:26 am
Thanked: 47 times
Followed by:13 members
GMAT Score:640

[CR][author's puncuation] HSPA posts

by HSPA » Wed Apr 06, 2011 4:12 am
Johnson is on firm ground when he asserts that the early editors of Dickinson's poetry often distorted her intentions. Yet Johnson's own, more faithful, text is still guilty of its own forms of distortion. To standardize Dickinson's often indecipherable handwritten punctuation by the use of the dash is to render permanent a casual mode of poetic phrasing that Dickinson surely never expected to see in print. It implies that Dickinson chose the dash as her typical mark of punctuation when, in fact, she apparently never made any definitive choice at all.
Which of the following best summarizes the author's main point?
(A) Although Johnson is right in criticizing Dickinson's early editors for their distortion of her work, his own text is guilty of equally serious distortions.
(B) Johnson's use of the dash in his text of Dickinson's poetry misleads readers about the poet's intentions.
(C) Because Dickinson never expected her poetry to be published, virtually any attempt at editing it must run counter to her intentions.
(D) Although Johnson's attempt to produce a more faithful text of Dickinson's poetry is well-meaning, his study of the material lacks sufficient thoroughness.
(E) Dickinson's editors, including Johnson, have failed to deal adequately with the problem of deciphering Dickinson's handwritten manuscripts
First take: 640 (50M, 27V) - RC needs 300% improvement
Second take: coming soon..
Regards,
HSPA.

Legendary Member
Posts: 857
Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2010 1:36 am
Thanked: 56 times
Followed by:15 members

by AIM GMAT » Wed Apr 06, 2011 4:44 am
(A) Although Johnson is right in criticizing Dickinson's early editors for their distortion of her work, his own text is guilty of equally serious distortions. -- [Same thing as the argument , restating also we are not aware or concerned about Johnson being right or wrong]

(B) Johnson's use of the dash in his text of Dickinson's poetry misleads readers about the poet's intentions. -- [She chose dash as permanent punctuation but readers were not aware of it , Bingo .. thismust be the answer ]

(C) Because Dickinson never expected her poetry to be published, virtually any attempt at editing it must run counter to her intentions. -- [Out of scope to discuss]

(D) Although Johnson's attempt to produce a more faithful text of Dickinson's poetry is well-meaning, his study of the material lacks sufficient thoroughness. -- [We are not aware about Johnson did lack throughness or not so OUT]

(E) Dickinson's editors, including Johnson, have failed to deal adequately with the problem of deciphering Dickinson's handwritten manuscripts -- [The probelm is not with deciphering handwritten manuscript , the problem is of dash used by author , the use of dash was not clear for other ppl editting the scripts.]


IMO B.
Thanks & Regards,
AIM GMAT

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1101
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 7:26 am
Thanked: 47 times
Followed by:13 members
GMAT Score:640

by HSPA » Wed Apr 06, 2011 4:59 am
thanks AIM... I missed the word decipher in E
First take: 640 (50M, 27V) - RC needs 300% improvement
Second take: coming soon..
Regards,
HSPA.

User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 78
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2010 2:22 am
Thanked: 2 times
Followed by:1 members

by gig92 » Wed Apr 06, 2011 5:10 am
HSPA wrote:Johnson is on firm ground when he asserts that the early editors of Dickinson's poetry often distorted her intentions. Yet Johnson's own, more faithful, text is still guilty of its own forms of distortion. To standardize Dickinson's often indecipherable handwritten punctuation by the use of the dash is to render permanent a casual mode of poetic phrasing that Dickinson surely never expected to see in print. It implies that Dickinson chose the dash as her typical mark of punctuation when, in fact, she apparently never made any definitive choice at all.
Which of the following best summarizes the author's main point?
(A) Although Johnson is right in criticizing Dickinson's early editors for their distortion of her work, his own text is guilty of equally serious distortions.
(B) Johnson's use of the dash in his text of Dickinson's poetry misleads readers about the poet's intentions.
(C) Because Dickinson never expected her poetry to be published, virtually any attempt at editing it must run counter to her intentions.
(D) Although Johnson's attempt to produce a more faithful text of Dickinson's poetry is well-meaning, his study of the material lacks sufficient thoroughness.
(E) Dickinson's editors, including Johnson, have failed to deal adequately with the problem of deciphering Dickinson's handwritten manuscripts
IMO: C
Dickinson surely never expected to see in print... and when, in fact, she apparently never made any definitive choice at all... emphasize that Dickinson never expected her poetry to be published.. So the option (C) most correctly presents the author's main point in the argument.
gig92

Legendary Member
Posts: 586
Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2010 4:38 am
Thanked: 31 times
Followed by:5 members
GMAT Score:730

by rohu27 » Wed Apr 06, 2011 7:22 pm
Agree with AIM.
just wanted to mention another reason to eliminate E (i got it dwn to B vs E)
E talks about deciphering Dicksons's handwritten manuscripts, where as the premise talks about Dicksons punctuation.