BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

How to solve

Expert replies
by kanika123 » Mon Jul 29, 2013 11:48 am
Four dollar amounts, w, x, y, and z, were invested in a business. Which amount was greatest?

1. y < z < x
2. x was 25 percent of the total of the four investments.


A. Statement 1 alone is sufficient but statement 2 alone is not sufficient to answer the question asked.

B. Statement 2 alone is sufficient but statement 1 alone is not sufficient to answer the question asked.

C. Both statements 1 and 2 together are sufficient to answer the question but neither statement is sufficient alone.

D. Each statement alone is sufficient to answer the question.

E. Statements 1 and 2 are not sufficient to answer the question asked and additional data is needed to answer the statements.

Which should be the correct option and why?
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by GMATGuruNY » Mon Jul 29, 2013 12:31 pm
kanika123 wrote:Four dollar amounts, w, x, y, and z, were invested in a business. Which amount was greatest?

1. y < z < x
2. x was 25 percent of the total of the four investments.
Statement 1: y < z < x
No information about w.
INSUFFICIENT.

Statement 2: x was 25 percent of the total of the four investments.
No information about w, y, or z.
INSUFFICIENT.

Statements combined:
Plug in the THRESHOLD.
Since y<z<x, and x=25%, the threshold for y and z is 25%: each must be LESS than this percentage.
If y=z=x=25%, then y+z+x = 75%, implying that w = 25%.
Since y and z must each be LESS than 25%, y+z+x < 75%, implying that w > 25%.
Thus, the greatest amount = w.
SUFFICIENT.

The correct answer is C.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by [email protected] » Mon Jul 29, 2013 12:34 pm
Hi kanika123,

DS questions test many different skills, one of which is your ability to make deductions when you only have a limited amount of information.

In this question, we're told that there are 4 variables (w, x, y and z) and we're asked which is biggest.

Fact 1 tells us y < z < x BUT we don't know anything about the value of w.
This fact ultimately means that either x is biggest (it's bigger than y and z and MIGHT be bigger than w) or w is biggest
Fact 1 is INSUFFICIENT

Fact 2 tells us that x = 25% of the total We don't know anything about the other 3 values (w, y and z), so there's no way to answer the question.
This fact ultimately means that x can't be biggest (it could be a 4-way tie, if they're each 25%, but if the others were all less than 25% then the math wouldn't add up to 100%, so x can't be biggest).
Fact 2 is INSUFFICIENT

Combining Facts, we know that x = 25%, y and z are both less than 25%, so the w has to account for everything else...

eg. 23% < 24% < 25% and the w would be everything else (in this case = 28%)
We have enough info to deduce that the w MUST be biggest

Final Answer: C

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
Contact Rich at [email protected]
Image
Join the discussion