BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Herd of Cows

Expert replies
by carlos.lara.7 » Thu Sep 15, 2016 4:13 pm
If a herd of cows is split in three unequal parts, how many there would be in the largest group?

(1) The number of cows in the two larger groups is 57. (2) The number of cows in the two smaller groups is 43.

A - statement (1), BY ITSELF is sufficient to answer the question but statement (2) by itself is not sufficient to answer the question

B - statement (2), BY ITSELF is sufficient to answer the question but statement (1) by itself is not sufficient to answer the question

C - BOTH statement (1) and (2) TOGETHER are sufficient to answer the question, but NEITHER statement BY ITSELF is sufficient to answer the question

D - EACH statement BY ITSELF is sufficient to answer the question

E - the two statements, even when taken TOGETHER, are NOT sufficient to answer the question
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by [email protected] » Thu Sep 15, 2016 4:41 pm
Hi carlos.lara.7,

We're told that a group of cows is split into 3 groups with a DIFFERENT number in each group. We're asked how many cows are in the LARGEST group.

1) The number of cows in the two larger groups is 57.

This Fact puts a limit on how big the largest group could be, but does NOT define the exact value of the group. For example...

IF...
Largest = 32
Middle = 25
Smallest = 18
Then the answer to the question is 32

IF...
Largest = 31
Middle = 26
Smallest = 17
Then the answer to the question is 31
Fact 1 is INSUFFICIENT

2) The number of cows in the two smaller groups is 43.

We face a similar situation in Fact 2 that we faced in Fact 1. This Fact tells us NOTHING about the size of the largest group though (only what it would be at the minimum).

IF...
Largest = 32
Middle = 25
Smallest = 18
Then the answer to the question is 32

IF...
Largest = 31
Middle = 26
Smallest = 17
Then the answer to the question is 31
Fact 2 is INSUFFICIENT

Combined, we still don't know the exact number of cows in any of the groups (the two examples that I provided 'overlap' with both Fact 1 and Fact 2), so there is clearly more than one possible answer.
Combined, INSUFFICIENT

Final Answer: E

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
Contact Rich at [email protected]
Image
Join the discussion

by Matt@VeritasPrep » Fri Sep 16, 2016 1:51 pm
Since the parts are unequal, let's call them a, b, c, with a > b > c.

S1:

a + b = 57

We could have anything: a = 41, b = 16, a = 53, b = 4, etc. Not sufficient.

S2:

b + c = 43

Same issue as above, not sufficient.

S1 + S2:

Three variables but only two equations! All we can say from the two together is that a - c = 14. (b could still be anything.) So we can't solve: we could have a = 33, b = 24, c = 19, or a = 32, b = 25, c = 18, etc. etc.
Join the discussion