BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Helping verbs in different tenses

Expert replies

by divineacclivity » Mon Jun 02, 2014 9:40 pm
Ron,

I read the explanations again and again & reached the following conclusion. Please correct me if I'm wrong.

What I gather from all of the explanations above, the following ones are correct:
I have never seen an aardvark, but last year my father did.
--> Helping verb changes tense but this is right.
I have never seen what my father did.
--> Now, this sentence would be wrong because it says: I never got to see what my father executed.
I have never seen an aardvark, but next year I may do.
--> wrong, because no two helping verbs are used together in this respect
I have never seen more aardvarks than I did last year.
--> this is also fine for the same reason that helping verbs can change tenses as long as there's no change in the meaning e.g. I have never seen what my father did
thanks in advance.
lunarpower wrote:
magic monkey wrote:I have never seen an aardvark, but last year my father saw one.
I have never seen an aardvark, but last year my father did.
I have never seen an aardvark, but next year I may see one.
I have never seen an aardvark, but next year I may do.
I have never seen more aardvarks than I saw last year.
I have never seen more aardvarks than I did last year.
all of these are fine except the fourth one. that one is incorrect because it contains two consecutive helping verbs ("may" and "do"); you can't use more than one helping verb.
Join the discussion

by magic monkey » Tue Jun 03, 2014 4:52 am
divineacclivity wrote:Ron,

I read the explanations again and again & reached the following conclusion. Please correct me if I'm wrong.

What I gather from all of the explanations above, the following ones are correct:
I have never seen an aardvark, but last year my father did.
--> Helping verb changes tense but this is right.
I have never seen what my father did.
--> Now, this sentence would be wrong because it says: I never got to see what my father executed.
I have never seen an aardvark, but next year I may do.
--> wrong, because no two helping verbs are used together in this respect
I have never seen more aardvarks than I did last year.
--> this is also fine for the same reason that helping verbs can change tenses as long as there's no change in the meaning e.g. I have never seen what my father did
thanks in advance.
lunarpower wrote:
magic monkey wrote:I have never seen an aardvark, but last year my father saw one.
I have never seen an aardvark, but last year my father did.
I have never seen an aardvark, but next year I may see one.
I have never seen an aardvark, but next year I may do.
I have never seen more aardvarks than I saw last year.
I have never seen more aardvarks than I did last year.
all of these are fine except the fourth one. that one is incorrect because it contains two consecutive helping verbs ("may" and "do"); you can't use more than one helping verb.
Hi divine,

As far as I know, all of your conclusions are correct except this,
I have never seen what my father did.
--> Now, this sentence would be wrong because it says: I never got to see what my father executed.
Just technically speaking, it is a reasonable sentence that makes sense, literally meaning WHAT MY FATHER DID.

Well it is ok, but it will not mean "father saw ..."
Join the discussion

by lunarpower » Wed Jun 04, 2014 12:30 am
divineacclivity wrote: I have never seen an aardvark, but last year my father did.
--> Helping verb changes tense but this is right.
"Helping verb changes tense" is incorrect. If that were the situation, the right-hand part would be "had" (and then you'd need additional context to justify the use of that tense, too).

"Do"/"did"/etc. can stand for an action verb that originally appears in ANY tense.

Your sentence is doing the same thing as this one:
I never saw as many things as my father did.

"Saw" and "have seen" are both tenses of "see". The fact that one of them has a helping verb, while the other doesn't, is irrelevant; they are two tenses of the same verb.

I have never seen what my father did.
--> Now, this sentence would be wrong because it says: I never got to see what my father executed.
If there is zero context (as is the case here), then, yes, it's ambiguous.

If the sentence is presented in a larger context that's sufficient to exclude one of the two interpretations, then the sentence is fine.
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron
Join the discussion

by lunarpower » Wed Jun 04, 2014 12:31 am
I have never seen an aardvark, but next year I may do.
--> wrong, because no two helping verbs are used together in this respect
Yes.
I have never seen more aardvarks than I did last year.
--> this is also fine for the same reason that helping verbs can change tenses as long as there's no change in the meaning e.g. I have never seen what my father did
thanks in advance.
Correct conclusion, but incorrect analysis. "Did" is just referring to a tense of "see" again (as in the first example above).
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron
Join the discussion

by arias » Thu May 07, 2015 8:01 am
lunarpower wrote:
I have never seen an aardvark, but next year I may do.
--> wrong, because no two helping verbs are used together in this respect
Yes.
I have never seen more aardvarks than I did last year.
--> this is also fine for the same reason that helping verbs can change tenses as long as there's no change in the meaning e.g. I have never seen what my father did
thanks in advance.
Correct conclusion, but incorrect analysis. "Did" is just referring to a tense of "see" again (as in the first example above).
It seems the 6th Mgmat guide still believe the tense between the verb and helping verb should match.
Quite strange...
Join the discussion