BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

130-point score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Help with Percentage Problem

Expert replies
by cholloway » Mon Jun 01, 2009 6:39 am
Can someone please tell me understand where I am making a mistake?

In 1992 the value of a house was 3/4 of the original puchase price. In 1996, the price was 2/3 the original purchase price. By approximately what percent did the value of this house decrease from 1992 to 1996?

My solution:

Assume the original value of the house is $100. Therefore the value of the house was $75 in 1992, and $66 in $1996. 75-66/75 = 9/75 = 3/25 = 12/100. I get a 12 percent change.

The correct answer is supposed to be 11.1%.
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by tdadic84 » Mon Jun 01, 2009 7:15 am
hello...

dont assume 100...get a multiple of 3 and 4...since 100 will leave you with $66,666 and can throw your calc's off...

i choose 120...

so in 1992 = $90,000 and in 1996 = $80,000

therefore...$10,000/90,000 = 11.11%
Join the discussion

by dmateer25 » Mon Jun 01, 2009 7:19 am
You got 12 instead of 11.111 because you rounded 66.6666666 to 66

If you used a number such as 12 as the original price you wouldn't have to round numbers.

Assume original price = 12
1992 = 9

1996 = 8

New - Old/Old

(8 – 9)/9 = -1/9 = -.1111111

So the change is -11.1%
Join the discussion

by cholloway » Mon Jun 01, 2009 7:20 am
OK, that makes sense. Thanks!
Join the discussion

by blackarrow » Mon Jun 01, 2009 8:13 am
Or you can just leave it in fractions

Assuming the house value was 100 originally (its always comfotable to chose 100)

in 1992 - 75

in 1996 -200/3

thus decrease percentage = ((75-200/3)/75)*100

the answer is 100/9 == 11.11%
Its better to burn out than to fade away
Join the discussion

Re: Help with Percentage Problem

by kvamsy » Mon Jun 01, 2009 7:49 pm
There is no need of assuming any original price because both are any way we can common factor is X both n numerator and denominator as given below.

(3/4-2/3)/3/4 - - - > 1/9

If u r calculating in percentage you can multiply by hundred that is 1/9*100 = 11.1%

As simple as that....
Join the discussion