BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Help w/ GMAT Prep DS Question

Problem Solving — algebra and arithmetic (GMAT Focus Edition)
Expert replies
by agkrause » Wed Jul 28, 2010 9:29 am
Hi - I was wondering if anyone knew a good way to approach the following problem:

Jason's salary and Karen's salary were each P percent greater in 1998 than 1995. What is the value of P?

(1) In 1995 Karen's salary was $2,000 greater than Jason's.
(2) In 1998, Karen's salary was $2,440 greater than Jason's.

I wanted to see if anyone had a more efficient way to approach the problem.

Thanks for taking a look,
agk
Join the discussion
Source: — Quantitative Reasoning |

by Tani » Wed Jul 28, 2010 12:15 pm
Try this:

Jason's salary = J
Karen's salary = J + 2000

after p% increase,

Jason's = (1+p)*J
Karen's = (1+p)*(J+2000)

The difference between these is $2,440.

Gives p = 22%
Tani Wolff
Join the discussion

by paruloberai » Sat Aug 07, 2010 2:08 am
agkrause wrote:Hi - I was wondering if anyone knew a good way to approach the following problem:

Jason's salary and Karen's salary were each P percent greater in 1998 than 1995. What is the value of P?

(1) In 1995 Karen's salary was $2,000 greater than Jason's.
(2) In 1998, Karen's salary was $2,440 greater than Jason's.

I wanted to see if anyone had a more efficient way to approach the problem.

Thanks for taking a look,
agk
Hi,

You could translate this problem into the following terms:
k = Karen's 1995 salary
j = Jason's 1995 salary
p = already defined in the problem

Then we have

(1) k = j + 2000
(2) k(1 + p/100) = j(1 + p/100) + 2440

None of the statements alone can give the value of p.

together: substitute j + 2000 for the first 'k'
(j + 2000)(1 + p/100) = j(1 + p/100) + 2440
2000(1 + p/100) = 2440
...so you can calculate p.
Hence, C.
Parul Oberai is a content expert for GMATLounge. She has a lot of experience helping GMAT students to be more efficient in solving quantitative problems. She can be reached at https://gmatlounge.com/ .
Join the discussion